|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-431||5th Cir.||Apr 17, 2019||Jun 24, 2019||5-4||Gorsuch||OT 2018|
Holding: Title 18 U. S. C. §924(c)(3)(B), which provides enhanced penalties for using a firearm during a “crime of violence,” is unconstitutionally vague.
Judgment: Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on June 24, 2019. Justice Kavanaugh filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Alito joined, and in which Chief Justice Roberts joined as to all but Part II-C.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 03 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 2, 2018)|
|Oct 16 2018||Letter of October 16, 2018 from the Solicitor General filed.|
|Oct 22 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 2, 2018 to December 3, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 25 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 3, 2018.|
|Nov 01 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 2, 2018 to December 3, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 05 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 3, 2018.|
|Nov 30 2018||Brief of respondent Andre Levon Glover in opposition filed.|
|Nov 30 2018||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Andre Levon Glover.|
|Nov 30 2018||Brief of respondent Maurice Lamont Davis in opposition filed.|
|Dec 03 2018||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Maurice Lamont Davis.|
|Dec 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Dec 19 2018||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 04 2019||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Maurice Lamont Davis GRANTED.|
|Jan 04 2019||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Andre Levon Glover GRANTED.|
|Jan 04 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jan 29 2019||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner United States.|
|Feb 11 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 17, 2019|
|Feb 12 2019||Brief of petitioner United States filed.|
|Feb 19 2019||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Mar 14 2019||Brief of Maurice Lamont Davis, et al. not accepted for filing. (Corrected brief submitted.) (March 18, 2019)|
|Mar 14 2019||Brief of respondents Maurice Lamont Davis, et al. filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 21 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 21 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.|
|Mar 21 2019||Brief amicus curiae of FAMM filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 21 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 05 2019||Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 05 2019||Motion to appoint counsel filed by respondent Andre Levon Glover.|
|Apr 17 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Brandon E. Beck, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Lubbock, Tex.|
|Apr 17 2019||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 13 2019||Motion to appoint counsel GRANTED, and J. Joseph Mongaras, Esq., of Dallas, Texas, is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent Andre L. Glover.|
|Jun 24 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Kavanaugh, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Alito, JJ., joined, and in which Roberts, C. J., joined as to all but Part II–C.|
|Jul 26 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
#SCOTUS does not take up 2nd question in the case, on whether to overrule its 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Full order is here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/012122zr_3f14.pdf https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1484606315519516675
#SCOTUS grants one new case, sets it for argument in April: Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, on whether a state has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
More opinions coming on Monday.
#SCOTUS website indicates that the Court is expected to release more opinions on Monday morning at 10 am.
The next #SCOTUS grants? Kevin McCarthy v. Nancy Pelosi in a fight over congressional proxy voting; the First Amendment-based ministerial exception to employment law returns; nondelegation doctrine (!); and the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.
Revenge of the rescheduled cases: Congressional proxy voting, the ministerial exception, and more - SCOTUSblog
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming con...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court, over dissents from the three liberal justices, rejects a request from Texas abortion clinics to immediately return the litigation over Texas' six-week abortion law to a federal district court.
The Supreme Court issues a single opinion today, ruling in an 8-1 vote that a criminal defendant's rights were violated under the Sixth Amendment's confrontation clause when the government introduced a plea allocution from another proceeding. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-637_10n2.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: We expect one or more opinions in argued cases to be issued starting at 10 a.m. EST. At 9:45, we'll fire up our live blog, where we'll also chat about this week's arguments and last night's ruling on Trump records. Grab your ☕️ & join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, Jan. 20 - SCOTUSblog
On Thursday, January 20, we will be live blogging as the court releases opinions in one or more argued cases f...