|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.
Issues: (1) Whether a defendant's general business contacts or sporadic and involuntary contacts in the forum state that have no causal connection to the plaintiff's cause of action can establish specific personal jurisdiction consistent with the due process clause; and (2) whether, under the “effects test” described in Calder v. Jones and Walden v. Fiore, the forum state must be the “focal point” of the alleged defamatory statements and the injury suffered, or whether the defendant's more general efforts to “serve the market” are sufficient to establish specific jurisdiction.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 26 2016||Application (16A210) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 8, 2016 to October 8, 2016, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Aug 29 2016||Application (16A210) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 8, 2016.|
|Oct 7 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2016)|
|Oct 25 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioners.|
|Nov 10 2016||Waiver of right of respondents Gloria de Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, A. G. J. T., et al. to respond filed.|
|Nov 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Nov 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of Texas Association of Broadcasters, et al. filed.|
|Nov 14 2016||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 9, 2016.|
|Nov 28 2016||Response Requested . (Due December 28, 2016)|
|Dec 16 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 27, 2017.|
|Jan 24 2017||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 3, 2017.|
|Feb 3 2017||Brief of respondents Gloria de Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, A. G. J. T., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 22 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 17, 2017.|
|Feb 22 2017||Reply of petitioners TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 19 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 22, 2017.|
|Jun 20 2017||Supplemental brief of petitioners TV Azteca, S.A.B. de C.V., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 21 2017||Supplemental brief of respondents Gloria de Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child, A. G. J. T., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 26 2017||Petition DENIED.|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster