|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-574||9th Cir.||Nov 4, 2013||Feb 25, 2014||9-0||Thomas||OT 2013|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.
Holding: When the conduct of the defendant, a Georgia police officer, occurred entirely in Georgia, the mere fact that his conduct affected plaintiffs with connections to Nevada does not authorize jurisdiction over him in Nevada.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on February 25, 2014.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 6 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 10, 2012)|
|Nov 30 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 9, 2013.|
|Jan 4 2013||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 24, 2013.|
|Jan 24 2013||Brief of respondents Gina Fiore, and Keith Gipson in opposition filed.|
|Feb 6 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 22, 2013.|
|Feb 6 2013||Reply of petitioner Anthony Walden filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 25 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 1, 2013.|
|Mar 4 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 7 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Mar 12 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Mar 25 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 28, 2013.|
|Mar 25 2013||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 26, 2013.|
|May 28 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs received)|
|May 28 2013||Brief of petitioner Anthony Walden filed.|
|May 31 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Charles W. Adams filed.|
|Jun 3 2013||Brief amici curiae of New England Legal Foundation and Associated Industries of Massachusetts filed.|
|Jun 4 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Jun 4 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Jun 4 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association filed.|
|Jun 4 2013||Brief amici curiae of Alabama, et al. filed.|
|Jul 26 2013||Brief of respondents Gina Fiore and Keith Gipson filed.|
|Jul 29 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Aug 2 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Workers' Injury Law & Advocacy Group filed.|
|Aug 19 2013||CIRCULATED..|
|Aug 20 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 4, 2013.|
|Aug 26 2013||Reply of petitioner Anthony Walden filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 24 2013||Record from U.S.C.A for 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Sep 24 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for District of Nevada is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 7 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Nov 4 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Washington, D. C.; and Melissa Arbus Sherry, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Thomas C. Goldstein, Washington, D. C.|
|Feb 25 2014||Judgment REVERSED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous court.|
|Mar 31 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.