Trump v. Vance
Linked with:
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19-635 | 2d Cir. | May 12, 2020 | Jul 9, 2020 | 7-2 | Roberts | OT 2019 |
Holding: Article II and the supremacy clause of the Constitution do not categorically preclude, or require a heightened standard for, the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president.
Judgment: Affirmed and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on July 9, 2020. Justice Kavanaugh filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Gorsuch joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Trump asks justices to block New York grand jury subpoena (Amy Howe, October 14, 2020)
- Roberts OKs request for Trump v. Vance ruling to take effect immediately (Amy Howe, July 17, 2020)
- Symposium: On Trump tax returns, the latest battles may be over, but the war rages on (John Malcolm, July 11, 2020)
- Symposium: Channeling an old chief to reject a new immunity (Toby Heytens and Martine Cicconi, July 10, 2020)
- Symposium: It must be nice to have John Marshall on your side (Josh Blackman, July 10, 2020)
- Symposium: A resounding rejection of Trumps authoritarian approach to the presidency (Jamila Benkato, Justin Florence and Ben Berwick, July 10, 2020)
- Symposium: The Trump subpoena cases and the search for normalcy (Peter Shane, July 10, 2020)
- Symposium: A better way to limit Congress subpoena power (Ilya Somin, July 9, 2020)
- Opinion analysis: Disputes over Trump financial records to continue (Amy Howe, July 9, 2020)
- Live blog of opinions (Update: Completed) (Kalvis Golde, July 9, 2020)
- Educational seminar: Debrief of Trump v. Mazars & Trump v. Vance (Katie Bart, May 14, 2020)
- Argument analysis: A marathon debate, and no clear winners, in debate over Trump tax returns (Amy Howe, May 12, 2020)
- Educational seminar: Preview of Trump v. Mazars & Trump v. Vance (Katie Bart, May 7, 2020)
- Argument preview: Justices to tackle disputes over access to Trump financial records (Amy Howe, May 1, 2020)
- Court sets cases for May telephone arguments, will make live audio available (Amy Howe, April 13, 2020)
- Justices postpone March argument session (Amy Howe, March 16, 2020)
- Symposium: Forget about taxes: Mazars is a big case (Victoria Nourse, March 12, 2020)
- Symposium: Separation of powers and federalism should guide the justices to protect the presidency and the courts from politicized investigations (Lawrence Joseph, March 11, 2020)
- Symposium: Vance, Mazars, Deutsche Bank: Is the president above the law after all? (Neil Kinkopf, March 11, 2020)
- Symposium: No. The founders did not want Congress doing criminal investigations - even of Trump (W. Burlette Carter, March 10, 2020)
- Symposium: Mazars and Vance may be political blockbusters, but they arent legal ones (Brianne Gorod and Ashwin Phatak, March 10, 2020)
- Symposium: Justices to tackle disputes over access to Trump financial records (Amy Howe, March 9, 2020)
- 2020 Supreme Court Preview presented by Casetext (part two) (SCOTUStalk, February 21, 2020)
- Justices issue March argument calendar (Amy Howe, January 31, 2020)
- Justices to take up battle over Trump financial documents (Amy Howe, December 13, 2019)
- Trump asks justices to block bank subpoenas (UPDATED) (Amy Howe, December 6, 2019)
- Trump asks justices to quash subpoena for financial records (Amy Howe, December 5, 2019)
- Justices block enforcement of subpoena for Trump financial records (Amy Howe, November 26, 2019)
- The solicitor general files brief in President Trumps challenge to New York subpoena (Steve Vladeck, November 25, 2019)
- President Trumps taxes reach the Supreme Court (Steve Vladeck, November 15, 2019)
- Trump returns to Supreme Court, asks justices to intervene in dispute over financial records (Amy Howe, November 15, 2019)