|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|21-378||5th Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2022|
Issues: (1) Whether Congress has the power under the Indian commerce clause or otherwise to enact laws governing state child-custody proceedings merely because the child is or may be an Indian; (2) whether the Indian classifications used in the Indian Child Welfare Act and its implementing regulations violate the Fifth Amendment’s equal-protection guarantee; (3) whether ICWA and its implementing regulations violate the anticommandeering doctrine by requiring states to implement Congress’s child-custody regime; and (4) whether ICWA and its implementing regulations violate the nondelegation doctrine by allowing individual tribes to alter the placement preferences enacted by Congress.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 03 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)|
|Sep 24 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 8, 2021 to November 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 27 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 8, 2021, for all respondents.|
|Oct 04 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Ohio filed.|
|Oct 05 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Project on Fair Representation filed.|
|Oct 08 2021||Brief amici curiae of Christian Alliance for Indian Child Welfare and ICWA Children and Families filed. VIDED.|
|Oct 08 2021||Brief amici curiae of Goldwater Institute, et al. filed.|
|Nov 01 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 8, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 02 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 8, 2021, for all respondents.|
|Dec 08 2021||Brief of respondents Cherokee Nation, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 08 2021||Brief of respondents Navajo Nation in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Dec 08 2021||Brief of respondents Chad Everet Brackeen, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Dec 08 2021||Brief of respondents Federal respondents in opposition filed.|
|Dec 17 2021||Reply of petitioner Texas filed.|
|Dec 22 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.|
|Jan 10 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.|
|Jan 18 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.|
|Feb 11 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.|
|Feb 22 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.|
|Feb 28 2022||Petition GRANTED. The petitions for writs of certiorari in Nos. 21-376, 21-377, and 21-380 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Parties that were plaintiffs/appellees in the lower courts shall file opening and reply briefs in conformity with Rules 33.1(g)(v) and 33.1(g)(vii), under the schedule set forth in Rules 25.1 and 25.3. Parties that were defendants/appellants in the lower courts shall file briefs in conformity with Rule 33.1(g)(vi), under the schedule set forth in Rule 25.2.|
|Feb 28 2022||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 21-376. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 21-376. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.