|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-6662||11th. Cir.||Jan 21, 2020||Feb 26, 2020||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2019|
Holding: The definition of in “serious drug offense” in 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(A)(ii) requires only that the state offense involve the conduct specified in the statute; it does not require that the state offense match certain generic offenses.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on February 26, 2020. Justice Kavanaugh filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 08 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2018)|
|Dec 04 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 13, 2018 to January 14, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 06 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 14, 2019.|
|Jan 10 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 14, 2019 to February 13, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 13, 2019.|
|Feb 13 2019||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Feb 13 2019||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under 15.5 filed by petitioner.|
|Feb 28 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.|
|Mar 11 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 05 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.|
|Jun 14 2019||Supplemental brief of petitioner Eddie Shular filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 26 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019.|
|Jun 28 2019||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Jul 18 2019||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 30 2019||Joint motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 25, 2019. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including November 22, 2019. The reply brief is to be filed on or before December 20, 2019.|
|Sep 10 2019||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Eddie Shular.|
|Sep 13 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Eddie Shular|
|Sep 25 2019||Brief of petitioner Eddie Shular filed.|
|Oct 02 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Oct 02 2019||Brief amicus curiae of FAMM filed.|
|Oct 02 2019||Brief amici curiae of American Immigration Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Oct 07 2019||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.|
|Nov 08 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, January 21, 2020.|
|Nov 22 2019||Brief of respondent United States filed.|
|Nov 26 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Dec 03 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit.|
|Dec 10 2019||The record from the U.S.D.C. Northern Dist. of Florida is electronic and located on PACER, the record is complete.|
|Dec 11 2019||The record received from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, this record is complete.|
|Dec 20 2019||Reply of petitioner Eddie Shular filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 21 2020||Argued. For petitioner: Richard M. Summa, Tallahassee, Fla. For respondent: Jonathan C. Bond, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Feb 26 2020||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Kavanaugh, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Mar 30 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.