Sherley v. Sebelius
Petition for certiorari denied on January 7, 2013
Issue: (1) Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that an Executive Order can and did excuse an agency"s failure to comply with the Administrative Procedure Act; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a preliminary-injunction ruling is binding law of the case, contrary to this Court"s settled rule that "the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by a court granting a preliminary injunction are not binding at trial on the merits," University of Texas v. Camenisch.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Stem cell dispute near end? (FINAL UPDATE) (Lyle Denniston, January 7, 2013)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 10/10/2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2012) |
| 10/26/2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 30, 2012. |
| 11/30/2012 | Brief of respondents Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 12/12/2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013. |
| 12/12/2012 | Reply of petitioners James L. Sherley, and Theresa Deisher filed. (Distributed) |
| 01/07/2013 | Petition DENIED. |
[##CERT-STAGE##]