|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-368||9th Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2017|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.
Issue: Whether orders denying state-action immunity to public entities are immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 07 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 11, 2017)|
|Oct 11 2017||Brief of respondent SolarCity Corporation in opposition filed.|
|Oct 11 2017||Brief amici curiae of American Public Power Association, et al. filed.|
|Oct 31 2017||Reply of petitioner Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District filed.|
|Nov 01 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/21/2017.|
|Nov 27 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2017.|
|Dec 01 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Dec 07 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Salt River Project Agricultural District|
|Jan 13 2018||Brief of petitioner Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District filed.|
|Jan 13 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of cost filed.)|
|Jan 22 2018||Brief amici curiae of National Governors Association, et al. filed.|
|Jan 22 2018||Brief amici curiae of American Public Power Association, et al. filed.|
|Jan 22 2018||Brief amici curiae of States of Tennessee, Arizona Arkansas Colorado Georgia Idaho Indiana Louisiana Kansas Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska New Hampshire Ohio Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Texas Utah Vermont West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming filed.|
|Jan 24 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, March 19, 2018|
|Feb 07 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Feb 12 2018||Letter of respondent Tesla Energy Operations, Inc., fka SolarCity Corporation filed.|
|Feb 12 2018||Brief of respondent Tesla Energy Operations, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 19 2018||Brief amici curiae of Center for Biological Diversity, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 20 2018||Brief amici curiae of Federal Courts Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of American Antitrust Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 20 2018||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Feb 21 2018||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Feb 26 2018||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Dist. of Arizona - Phoenix. The record is electronic and located on PACER. Part of the record is Sealed and electronic.|
|Mar 02 2018||Reply of petitioner Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 05 2018||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Mar 08 2018||Joint letter of March 8, 2018, from counsel received.|
|Mar 09 2018||This case is removed from the argument calendar for Monday, March 19, 2018, and will be rescheduled for the April 2018 argument session.|
|Mar 12 2018||RE SET FOR ARUMENT ON Tuesday, April 17, 2018|
|Mar 20 2018||Stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 received.|
|Mar 22 2018||Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.