|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-628||9th Cir.||Oct 5, 2016||Dec 6, 2016||8-0||Alito||OT 2016|
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit properly applied the court's decision in Dirks v. Securities and Exchange Commission to affirm Bassam Salman's conviction because, under Dirks, the jury could infer that Salman's tipper personally benefited from making a gift of confidential information to a trading relative.
Judgment: Affirmed, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Alito on December 6, 2016.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 10 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 14, 2015)|
|Dec 14 2015||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Dec 21 2015||Reply of petitioner Bassam Yacoub Salman filed.|
|Dec 30 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 15, 2016.|
|Jan 19 2016||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|Feb 09 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 6, 2016.|
|Feb 09 2016||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 1, 2016.|
|Apr 27 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.|
|May 06 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|May 06 2016||Brief of petitioner Bassam Y. Salman filed.|
|May 13 2016||Brief amicus curiae of The NYU Center on the Administration of Criminal Law in support of neither party filed.|
|May 13 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association in support of neither party filed.|
|May 13 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the New York Council of Defense Lawyers filed.|
|May 13 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Mark Cuban filed.|
|May 13 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Daryl M. Payton filed.|
|May 13 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.|
|Jul 13 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, October 5, 2016.|
|Jul 22 2016||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Jul 23 2016||Record received from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACAER.|
|Jul 23 2016||Record received from U.S.D.C. of California Northern District of San Francisco is electronic. This record is SEALED.|
|Jul 28 2016||Record received from U.S.D.C. Northern District of California, this record is SEALED. 1 Box.|
|Aug 01 2016||Brief of respondent United States filed.|
|Aug 08 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Richard D. Freer filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 08 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Occupy the SEC (OSEC) filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 09 2016||CIRCULATED|
|Aug 31 2016||Reply of petitioner Bassam Yacoub Salman filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 05 2016||Argued. For petitioner: Alexandra A. E. Shapiro, New York, N. Y. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Dec 06 2016||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Jan 09 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.