|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-659||11th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: (1) Under what circumstances a civil forfeiture claimant “substantially prevail[s]” under 28 U.S.C. § 2465(b)(1); and (2) whether, in civil forfeiture lawsuits, when a district court has ordered the United States to return the seized money and the lawsuit will never be refiled, it is an abuse of discretion for the dismissal to be without prejudice.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 17 2019||Application (19A321) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 6, 2019 to November 21, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Sep 25 2019||Application (19A321) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 21, 2019.|
|Nov 19 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)|
|Nov 26 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Miladis Salgado.|
|Dec 05 2019||Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.|
|Dec 17 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Law and Economics Scholars filed.|
|Dec 17 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Practicing Attorneys filed.|
|Dec 18 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Dec 20 2019||Response Requested. (Due January 21, 2020)|
|Dec 23 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Jan 14 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 21, 2020 to February 20, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 15 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 20, 2020.|
|Feb 18 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 20, 2020 to February 28, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 19 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 28, 2020.|
|Feb 28 2020||Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.|
|Mar 16 2020||Reply of petitioner Miladis Salgado filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.|
|Apr 06 2020||Petition DENIED.|
🚨 LIVE NOW 🚨 5PM on IGTV #SimplePolitics join me & @AHoweBlogger editor / reporter for the @SCOTUSblog for a great conversation on the recent decisions by the Supreme Court. There is so much to talk about.
SimplePolitics with Kim Wehle - Special Guest Bill Kristol, Editor-At-Large, The Bulwark
Tonight on #SimplePolitics, Bill Kristol and I have an in-depth conversation about Impeachment, what‘s next for ...
ICYMI: We got Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s first majority opinion today.
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, March 4, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.