Russo v. June Medical Services LLC
Consolidated with:
Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18-1460 | Mar 4, 2020 | Jun 29, 2020 | 5-4 | Breyer | OT 2019 |
Holding: Louisiana's Unsafe Abortion Protection Act, requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, is unconstitutional.
Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on June 29, 2020. Justice Breyer announced the judgment of the court and delivered an opinion, in which Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan joined. Chief Justice Roberts filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Gorsuch joined, Justice Thomas joined except as to Parts III"C and IV"F and Justice Kavanaugh joined as to Parts I, II and III. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Kavanaugh filed a dissenting opinion.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Symposium: How to count to one (John Knepper, July 1, 2020)
- Symposium: June Medical and the many faces of judicial discretion (Jane Schacter, June 30, 2020)
- Symposium: The chief justice restores the Casey standard even while undermining womens interests in Louisiana (Erika Bachiochi, June 30, 2020)
- Symposium: June Medical decision is no cause for congressional complacency (Richard Blumenthal, June 30, 2020)
- Symposium: June Medical Services v. Russo: When a win is not a win (Gretchen Borchelt, June 30, 2020)
- Symposium: Chief Justice Roberts reins in the cavalry of abortion providers charging toward the elimination of abortion regulation (Cynthia Yee-Wallace, June 29, 2020)
- Opinion analysis: With Roberts providing the fifth vote, court strikes down Louisiana abortion law (Updated) (Amy Howe, June 29, 2020)
- Live blog of orders and opinions (Update: Completed) (Kalvis Golde, June 29, 2020)
- A view from the courtroom: Strong feelings in the latest abortion case (Mark Walsh, March 4, 2020)
- Argument analysis: Justices grapple with Louisiana abortion law (Updated) (Amy Howe, March 4, 2020)
- Argument preview: Abortion debate returns to the Roberts Court (Amy Howe, February 26, 2020)
- Symposium: June Medical Services and the future of Article III standing in abortion cases (Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck, February 3, 2020)
- Symposium: Congress to Supreme Court: Abortionists dont represent women (Catherine Glenn Foster and Natalie Hejran, February 3, 2020)
- Symposium: Will the Supreme Court legitimate pretext? (Aziza Ahmed, January 31, 2020)
- Symposium: After 40+ years it is clear women can speak for themselves (Teresa Stanton Collett, January 30, 2020)
- Symposium: Abortion: A right in name only? (Jennifer Dalven, January 29, 2020)
- Symposium: A long-awaited opportunity to close the loophole on third-party standing (Denise Harle, January 29, 2020)
- Symposium: June Medical Services An opportunity to reject invasive appellate review (Fadwa Hammoud, January 28, 2020)
- Symposium: As states seek to protect women, the court with June Medical Services has multiple ways to end abortion litigation free-for-all (Thomas Fisher, January 28, 2020)
- Symposium: Abortion debate returns to the Roberts Court (Amy Howe, January 27, 2020)
- Federal governments brief in abortion case supports Louisianas position, raises possibility of overruling Whole Womans Health (Amy Howe, January 3, 2020)
- Abortion, CFPB cases scheduled for February sitting (Amy Howe, November 26, 2019)
- Justices grant new cases for upcoming term, will tackle Louisiana abortion dispute (Amy Howe, October 4, 2019)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
05/20/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 24, 2019) |
06/03/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 24, 2019 to August 23, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
06/05/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 23, 2019. |
06/21/2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Senator Josh Hawley filed. VIDED. |
06/24/2019 | Brief amicus curiae of Americans United for Life filed. |
06/24/2019 | Amicus brief of 2,556 Operation Outcry Women Hurt By Abortion and The Justice Foundation not accepted for filing. (June 24, 2019 -- Corrected version to be submitted) |
06/24/2019 | Brief amici curiae of State of Indiana, et al. filed. |
06/24/2019 | Amicus brief of American Center for Law and Justice not accepted for filing. (June 27, 2019)(Corrected version submitted) |
06/24/2019 | Brief amicus curiae of American Center for Law and Justice filed. |
06/24/2019 | Brief amici curiae of 2,556 Operation Outcry Women Hurt By Abortion and The Justice Foundation filed. |
08/23/2019 | Brief of respondents June Medical Services L.L.C., et al. in opposition filed. |
09/09/2019 | Reply of petitioner Rebekah Gee, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals filed. |
09/11/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019. |
10/04/2019 | Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 18-1323 is granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. |
10/04/2019 | Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 18-1323. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 18-1323. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.” |
11/26/2019 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 4, 2020. VIDED. |
01/09/2020 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit. |
01/10/2020 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 5th circuit is electronic and located on PACER. |
01/21/2020 | CIRCULATED |
03/04/2020 | Argued. For June Medical Services L.L.C., et al.: Julie Rikelman, New York, N. Y. For Stephen Russo, Interim Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals: Elizabeth Murrill, Solicitor General, Baton Rouge, La.; and Jeffrey B. Wall, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) VIDED. |
06/29/2020 | Judgment REVERSED. Breyer, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Roberts, C. J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined, in which Thomas, J., joined except as to Parts III–C and IV–F, and in which Kavanaugh, J., joined as to Parts I, II, and III. Gorsuch, J., and Kavanaugh, J., filed dissenting opinions. VIDED. |
07/31/2020 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |