|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|12-895||10th Cir.||Nov 12, 2013||Mar 5, 2014||7-2||Kagan||OT 2013|
Holding: For purposes of “aiding and abetting” liability under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), which prohibits “us[ing] or carr[ying] a firearm “during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime,” the government must show that the defendant actively participated in the underlying drug trafficking or violent crime with advance knowledge that a confederate would use or carry a gun during the crime’s commission. The Court vacated the decision below and remanded the case because the trial court failed to instruct the jury that the defendant must have “advance knowledge” – that is, knowledge sufficiently in advance to have some “realistic opportunity to quit the crime” – that the gun would be used or carried.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on March 5, 2014. Justice Scalia joined the opinion in all but footnotes 7 and 8. Justice Alito filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Thomas joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 30 2012||Application (12A563) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 17, 2012 to January 16, 2013, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Dec 4 2012||Application (12A563) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 16, 2013.|
|Jan 16 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 21, 2013)|
|Feb 13 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 25, 2013.|
|Mar 12 2013||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 24, 2013.|
|Apr 24 2013||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|May 7 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 23, 2013.|
|May 7 2013||Reply of petitioner Justus C. Rosemond filed. (Distributed)|
|May 28 2013||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 13 2013||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 2, 2013.|
|Jun 13 2013||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 23, 2013.|
|Aug 2 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 2 2013||Brief of petitioner Justus C. Rosemond filed.|
|Aug 2 2013||Motion to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal filed by petitioner Justus C. Rosemond.|
|Aug 9 2013||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Aug 9 2013||Brief amici curiae of Gun Owners Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Aug 14 2013||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013.|
|Aug 19 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 20 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 12, 2013.|
|Sep 6 2013||Record received from United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1-box). There is a sealed document included in this record.|
|Sep 11 2013||Records received from USDC for the District of Utah electronically filed (Not PACER), which includes sealed documents. (3-files)|
|Sep 23 2013||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 7 2013||Motion to file Volume II of the joint appendix under seal GRANTED.|
|Oct 22 2013||Reply of petitioner Justus C. Rosemond filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 12 2013||Argued. For petitioner: John P. Elwood, Washington, D. C. For respondent: John F. Bash, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Mar 5 2014||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor, JJ., joined, and in which Scalia, J., joined in all but footnotes 7 and 8. Alito, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Thomas, J., joined.|
|Apr 7 2014||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
|Apr 8 2014||Record received from United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has been returned.|
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
In yet another Friday night shadow docket order, a divided Supreme Court sides with challengers to California’s COVID-related restrictions. Brief per curiam opinion and dissent from Justice Kagan: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
By vote of 5-4, #SCOTUS blocks California's COVID-related restrictions on in-home prayer meetings and worship. Opinion & Kagan's dissent are here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
President Biden will sign an executive order authorizing a commission to study Supreme Court reform. The commission will review “the length of service and turnover of justices on the court; the membership and size of the court” among other topics.
President Biden to Sign Executive Order Creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States | The White House
President Biden will today issue an executive order forming the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, comprised of a
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.