|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1094||9th Cir.||Nov 27, 2018||Feb 26, 2019||9-0||Sotomayor||OT 2018|
Holding: Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), which establishes a 14-day deadline to seek permission to appeal an order granting or denying class certification, is not subject to equitable tolling.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on February 26, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 01 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 7, 2018)|
|Feb 15 2018||Waiver of right of respondent Troy Lambert to respond filed.|
|Feb 28 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018.|
|Mar 07 2018||Response Requested. (Due April 6, 2018)|
|Mar 14 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 6, 2018 to June 1, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 27 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including May 14, 2018.|
|May 14 2018||Brief of respondent Troy Lambert in opposition filed.|
|May 23 2018||Reply of petitioner Nutraceutical Corporation filed.|
|May 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.|
|Jun 18 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.|
|Jun 25 2018||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 16 2018||Joint motion for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (July 23, 2018 - Corrected motion to be submitted.)|
|Jul 24 2018||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the opening briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 30 2018||Joint motion to extend the time to file the opening briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 20, 2018. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 1, 2018.|
|Aug 20 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 20 2018||Brief of petitioner Nutraceutical Corporation filed.|
|Oct 01 2018||Brief of respondent Troy Lambert filed.|
|Oct 09 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, November 27, 2018|
|Oct 15 2018||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Oct 18 2018||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Central District of California (Western Division - Los Angeles) is electronic and located on PACER, also received are Restricted material that's electronic.|
|Oct 18 2018||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, also received are Restricted materials (1 Envelope).|
|Oct 19 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 31 2018||Reply of petitioner Nutraceutical Corporation filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 27 2018||Argued. For petitioner: John Hueston, Los Angeles, Cal. For respondent: Jonathan A. Herstoff, New York, N. Y.|
|Feb 26 2019||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Apr 01 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.