|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1094||9th Cir.||Nov 27, 2018||Feb 26, 2019||9-0||Sotomayor||OT 2018|
Holding: Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), which establishes a 14-day deadline to seek permission to appeal an order granting or denying class certification, is not subject to equitable tolling.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on February 26, 2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 01 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 7, 2018)|
|Feb 15 2018||Waiver of right of respondent Troy Lambert to respond filed.|
|Feb 28 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018.|
|Mar 07 2018||Response Requested. (Due April 6, 2018)|
|Mar 14 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 6, 2018 to June 1, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 27 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including May 14, 2018.|
|May 14 2018||Brief of respondent Troy Lambert in opposition filed.|
|May 23 2018||Reply of petitioner Nutraceutical Corporation filed.|
|May 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/14/2018.|
|Jun 18 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.|
|Jun 25 2018||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 16 2018||Joint motion for an extension of time not accepted for filing. (July 23, 2018 - Corrected motion to be submitted.)|
|Jul 24 2018||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the opening briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 30 2018||Joint motion to extend the time to file the opening briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 20, 2018. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 1, 2018.|
|Aug 20 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 20 2018||Brief of petitioner Nutraceutical Corporation filed.|
|Oct 01 2018||Brief of respondent Troy Lambert filed.|
|Oct 09 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, November 27, 2018|
|Oct 15 2018||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Oct 18 2018||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Central District of California (Western Division - Los Angeles) is electronic and located on PACER, also received are Restricted material that's electronic.|
|Oct 18 2018||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, also received are Restricted materials (1 Envelope).|
|Oct 19 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 31 2018||Reply of petitioner Nutraceutical Corporation filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 27 2018||Argued. For petitioner: John Hueston, Los Angeles, Cal. For respondent: Jonathan A. Herstoff, New York, N. Y.|
|Feb 26 2019||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Apr 01 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.