Nicholson v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.
Petition for certiorari denied on March 5, 2018
Issue: Whether a debtor who has inadvertently failed to disclose the existence of a potential claim in a bankruptcy petition should be estopped from litigating that claim because she is attributed a presumption of deceit where she had knowledge of the facts that gave rise to the undisclosed claim without regard to her subjective intent.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, January 30, 2018)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 11/22/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 27, 2017) |
| 12/08/2017 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 27, 2017 to January 26, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 12/12/2017 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 26, 2018 |
| 01/25/2018 | Brief of respondents Thrifty Payless, Inc., and Rite Aid Corporation in opposition filed. |
| 02/12/2018 | Reply of petitioners Brent Nicholson, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 02/14/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/2/2018. |
| 03/05/2018 | Petition DENIED. |