Moores v. Hildes
Petition for certiorari denied on October 6, 2014
Issue: Whether a plaintiff may state a claim under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, which provides for strict liability "on account of" defective registration statements, where he made an irrevocable investment decision to acquire his securities before a registration statement covering the issuance of those securities existed. CVSG: 08/27/2014.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- U.S. urges review of investment cases (Lyle Denniston, September 17, 2014)
- Petition of the day (Mary Pat Dwyer, March 18, 2014)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
12/30/2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 3, 2014) |
01/07/2014 | Waiver of right of respondent David Hildes, Individually and as Trustee of the David and Kathleen Hildes 1999 Charitable Remainder Unitrust Dated June 25, 1999 to respond filed. |
01/15/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014. |
01/17/2014 | Response Requested . (Due February 18, 2014) |
02/17/2014 | Brief of respondent David Hildes, Individually and as Trustee of the David and Kathleen Hildes 1999 Charitable Remainder Unitrust Dated June 25, 1999 in opposition filed. |
03/04/2014 | Reply of petitioners John J. Moores, et al. filed. |
03/05/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 21, 2014. |
03/24/2014 | The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. |
08/27/2014 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. |
09/10/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014. |
10/06/2014 | Petition DENIED. |