|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-8995||6th Cir.||Feb 26, 2019||Jun 2, 2019||5-4||Thomas||OT 2018|
Holding: Pretrial detention later credited as time served for a new conviction tolls a supervised-release term under 18 U.S.C. §3624(e), even if the court must make the tolling calculation after learning whether the time will be credited.
Judgment: Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 2, 2019. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Gorsuch joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 15 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 18, 2018)|
|Jun 13 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 18, 2018 to July 18, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 14 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 18, 2018.|
|Jul 11 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2018 to August 17, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 12 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 17, 2018.|
|Aug 13 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 17, 2018 to September 17, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 13 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 17, 2018.|
|Sep 17 2018||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Oct 01 2018||Reply of petitioner Jason Mont filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 04 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 02 2018||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Dec 17 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Dec 17 2018||Brief of petitioner Jason Mont filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT for Tuesday, February 26, 2019.|
|Jan 11 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Jan 11 2019||Record from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is available both on PACER and electronic.|
|Jan 15 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Jan 16 2019||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 14 2019||Reply of petitioner Jason Mont filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 26 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Vanessa F. Malone, Akron, Ohio. For respondent: Jenny Ellickson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 03 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Alito, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, Kagan, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined.|
|Jul 05 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: The Justice Department, as expected, says it plans to ask the Supreme Court to block enforcement of the Texas law that bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
NEW: Biden's commission studying proposals for Supreme Court reform has released 200+ pages of "discussion materials" in advance of its final report, slated to be issued next month. The materials are divided into five categories and are available here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/pcscotus/public-meetings/october-15-2021-pcscotus-meeting/
Curious: This morning the Supreme Court website had a dropdown menu option called “financial disclosure reports” (although nothing to see when you click on it). Now it’s gone
Today at SCOTUS: The Biden administration will appear before the justices asking to reinstate the death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev -- despite Biden's campaign pledge to end the death penalty and the DOJ's recent moratorium on federal executions.
Brett Kavanaugh was back on the bench today after participating in last week's arguments remotely due to his positive COVID test. Here's the full nine-person bench, in a sketch by @Courtartist.
#SCOTUS calls for the views of the US Solicitor General in Epic Systems v. Tata Consultancy Services, re whether a punitive damages award that complies with a state law that caps punitive damages passes constitutional muster