|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-8995||6th Cir.||Feb 26, 2019||Jun 2, 2019||5-4||Thomas||OT 2018|
Holding: Pretrial detention later credited as time served for a new conviction tolls a supervised-release term under 18 U.S.C. §3624(e), even if the court must make the tolling calculation after learning whether the time will be credited.
Judgment: Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 2, 2019. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Kagan, and Gorsuch joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 15 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 18, 2018)|
|Jun 13 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 18, 2018 to July 18, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jun 14 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 18, 2018.|
|Jul 11 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2018 to August 17, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 12 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 17, 2018.|
|Aug 13 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 17, 2018 to September 17, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Aug 13 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 17, 2018.|
|Sep 17 2018||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Oct 01 2018||Reply of petitioner Jason Mont filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 04 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 02 2018||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED.|
|Dec 17 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Dec 17 2018||Brief of petitioner Jason Mont filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT for Tuesday, February 26, 2019.|
|Jan 11 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Jan 11 2019||Record from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is available both on PACER and electronic.|
|Jan 15 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Jan 16 2019||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 14 2019||Reply of petitioner Jason Mont filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 26 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Vanessa F. Malone, Akron, Ohio. For respondent: Jenny Ellickson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 03 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Alito, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Breyer, Kagan, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined.|
|Jul 05 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.