|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-784||7th Cir.||Nov 6, 2017||Feb 27, 2018||9-0||Sotomayor||OT 2017|
Holding: The Bankruptcy Code allows trustees to set aside and recover certain transfers for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate, including certain fraudulent transfers “of an interest of the debtor in property”; the Bankruptcy Code also sets out a number of limits on the exercise of these avoiding powers, including the Section 546(e) safe harbor – which, inter alia, provides that a “trustee may not avoid a transfer that is a … settlement payment … made by or to (or for the benefit of) a … financial institution .. or that is a transfer made by or to (or for the benefit of) a … financial institution … in connection with a securities contract.” In the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filed by Valley View Downs and its parent company, the only relevant transfer for purposes of the Section 546(e) safe harbor is the transfer that the trustee, FTI Consulting Inc., seeks to avoid, i.e., the transfer from Valley View to Merit Management Group for the sale of Bedford Downs Management’s stock.
Judgment: Affirmed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on February 27, 2018.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 14 2016||Application (16A492) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 28, 2016 to December 19, 2016, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Nov 17 2016||Application (16A492) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 19, 2016.|
|Dec 16 2016||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 19, 2017)|
|Jan 19 2017||Brief of respondent FTI Consulting, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 03 2017||Reply of petitioner Merit Management Group, LP filed.|
|Feb 08 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 24, 2017.|
|Feb 22 2017||Rescheduled.|
|Feb 27 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 3, 2017.|
|Feb 27 2017||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 13 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 17, 2017.|
|Mar 13 2017||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 20 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 24, 2017.|
|Mar 20 2017||Rescheduled.|
|Mar 27 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 31, 2017.|
|Mar 28 2017||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 10 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 13, 2017.|
|Apr 17 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 21, 2017.|
|Apr 24 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 28, 2017.|
|May 01 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 05 2017||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including July 13, 2017.|
|Jun 05 2017||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 11, 2017.|
|Jun 22 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party from counsel for the petitioner.|
|Jun 28 2017||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the respondent.|
|Jul 13 2017||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jul 13 2017||Brief of petitioner Merit Management Group, LP filed.|
|Jul 18 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Opportunity Partners, L.P. filed.|
|Jul 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of Various Former Tribune and Lyondell Shareholders filed.|
|Aug 31 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 6, 2017|
|Sep 07 2017||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 11 2017||Brief of respondent FTI Consulting, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 18 2017||Brief amici curiae of Tribune Company Retirees and Noteholders filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 18 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 18 2017||Brief amici curiae of Bankruptcy Law Professors Ralph Brubaker, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 06 2017||Reply of petitioner Merit Management Group, LP filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 06 2017||Argued. For petitioner: Brian C. Walsh, St. Louis, Mo. For respondent: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C.|
|Feb 27 2018||Judgment is affirmed and case remanded. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Apr 02 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: The Supreme Court will review the legality of Biden's student-debt relief plan. The justices will hear oral argument in February. In the meantime, the plan remains blocked as a result of lower-court rulings.
Today at SCOTUS: One oral argument on the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act. Is it "jurisdictional"? Or just a "claim-processing rule"? That might sound arcane, but cases like these affect the ability of citizens to sue the federal government.
A squabble over a forest road may pave the way for further narrowing of “jurisdictional” timing rules - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court ...
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.