|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-663||5th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether prohibiting interstate handgun sales, facially or as applied to consumers whose home jurisdictions authorize such transactions, violates the Second Amendment and the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 16 2018||Application (18A179) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 18, 2018 to December 17, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Aug 17 2018||Application (18A179) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until November 19, 2018.|
|Nov 19 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 21, 2018)|
|Dec 12 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 21, 2018 to January 22, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 13 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2019.|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amici curiae of Professors of Second Amendment Law, et al. filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amici curiae of The States of Texas, et al. filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amici curiae of The Madison Society Foundation, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc.|
|Jan 17 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2019 to February 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 18 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 21, 2019.|
|Feb 21 2019||Brief of respondents William P. Barr, Attorney General, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 11 2019||Reply of petitioners Fredric Mance, et al. filed.|
|Mar 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.|
|Mar 27 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 08 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Apr 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.|
|May 11 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by The National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. GRANTED.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.