Skip to content

Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc.

Linked with:

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-786 Fed. Cir. Apr 30, 2014 Jun 2, 2014 9-0 Alito OT 2013

Holding: A defendant is not liable for inducing infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) when no one has directly infringed Section 217(a) or any other statutory provision.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Alito on June 2, 2014.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/13/2012Application (12A482) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 29, 2012 to December 29, 2012, submitted to The Chief Justice.
11/15/2012Application (12A482) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 28, 2012.
12/28/2012Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 1, 2013)
01/03/2013Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
01/23/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 4, 2013.
02/01/2013Brief amici curiae of Altera Corporation, et al. filed. VIDED.
02/01/2013Brief amici curiae of Google, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED.
02/01/2013Brief amici curiae of CTIA - The Wireless Association, et al filed. VIDED.
02/27/2013Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including April 3, 2013.
04/03/2013Brief of respondents Akamai Technologies, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
05/20/2013Reply of petitioner Limelight Networks, Inc. filed.
05/21/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 6, 2013.
06/10/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013.
06/17/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 20, 2013.
06/24/2013The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in these cases (see No. 12-960) expressing the views of the United States. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
12/10/2013Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. VIDED.
12/23/2013Supplemental brief of respondents Akamai Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. VIDED.
12/24/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 10, 2014.
01/10/2014Petition GRANTED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
01/17/2014Justice Alito is no longer recused in this case.
01/31/2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
02/11/2014SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, April 30, 2014
02/18/2014Record received from U.S.D.C. Massachusetts is electronic and located on PACER.
02/19/2014Brief amici curiae of Ten Intellectual Property Law Professors filed.
02/19/2014Brief amici curiae of Patent and Intellectual Property Law Scholars filed.
02/24/2014Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
02/24/2014Brief of petitioner Limelight Networks, Inc. filed.
02/27/2014Brief amici curiae of Altera Corporation, et al. filed.
02/28/2014Brief amici curiae of Newegg and L.L. Bean filed.
02/28/2014Brief amicus curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation filed.
03/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of Microsoft Corporation filed.
03/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.
03/03/2014Brief amici curiae of The Clearing House, et al. filed.
03/03/2014Brief amici curiae of Cargill, Inc., et al. filed.
03/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of International Business Machines Corp. in support of neither party filed.
03/03/2014Brief amici curiae of Google, Inc., et al. filed.
03/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association in support of neither party filed.
03/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of CTIA - The Wireless Association filed.
03/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of Conejo Valley Bar Association in support of neither party filed. (Distributed)
03/03/2014Brief amicus curiae of The American Bar Association in support of neither party filed. (Distributed)
03/06/2014Record received from U.S.C.A. for the Federal Circuit is electronic. (Not on PACER)
03/10/2014CIRCULATED.
03/20/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
03/26/2014Brief of respondents Akamai Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
04/01/2014Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association ("AIPLA") filed. (Distributed)
04/01/2014Brief amici curiae of Bally Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
04/02/2014Brief amicus curiae of Eli Lilly and Company filed. (Distributed)
04/02/2014Brief amicus curiae of Robert Mankes filed. (Distributed)
04/02/2014Brief amicus curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed. (Distributed)
04/02/2014Brief amicus curiae of Biotechnology Industry Organization filed. (Distributed)
04/02/2014Brief amici curiae of Myriad Genetics, Inc., and Genomic Health, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
04/02/2014Brief amicus curiae of William Mitchell College of Law Intellectual Property Institute filed. (Distribnuted)
04/18/2014Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
04/22/2014Reply of petitioner Limelight Networks, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
04/30/2014Argued. For petitioner: Aaron M. Panner, Washington, D. C.; and Ginger D. Anders, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Seth P. Waxman, Washington, D. C.
06/02/2014Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
07/07/2014Judgment issued.