|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-1351||9th Cir.||Jan 15, 2013||Mar 4, 2013||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2012|
Holding: The Gonzalez Act, 10 U.S.C. § 1089(e), which provides that the intentional tort exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act does not apply to “any cause of action arising out of a negligent or wrongful act or omission in the performance of medical . . . functions,” permits a suit against the United States alleging medical battery by a Navy doctor acting within the scope of his employment.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on March 4, 2013. The opinion is unanimous except insofar as Justice Scalia did not join footnotes 6 and 7.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 8 2012||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 11, 2012)|
|Jun 6 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 11, 2012.|
|Jul 11 2012||Brief of respondents United States in opposition filed.|
|Jul 25 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 24, 2012.|
|Sep 25 2012||Petition GRANTED.|
|Oct 4 2012||James A. Feldman, Esquire, of Washington, D.C., is invited to brief and argue this case, as amicus curiae, in support of the petitioner.|
|Oct 15 2012||The time to file the joint appendix and brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of petitioner is extended to and including November 14, 2012.|
|Oct 15 2012||The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including December 17, 2012.|
|Oct 15 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by Court-Appointed amicus curiae in support of petitioner.|
|Oct 23 2012||Record from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic.-|
|Oct 23 2012||Record from U.S.C.A. for the District of Guam is electronic.|
|Oct 29 2012||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by Court-Appointed amicus curiae in support of petitioner GRANTED.|
|Oct 31 2012||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 15, 2013|
|Nov 14 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Court-Appointed amicus curiae in support of petitioner filed.|
|Dec 17 2012||Brief of respondents United States, et al. filed.|
|Dec 19 2012||CIRCULATED.|
|Jan 4 2013||Reply of petitioner Court-Appointed amicus curiae in support of petitioner filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 15 2013||Argued. For Court-Appointed amicus curiae in support of petitioner: James A. Feldman, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Pratik A. Shah, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Mar 4 2013||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, which was unanimous except insofar as Scalia, J., did not join footnotes 6 and 7.|
|Apr 5 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.