Leonard v. Texas
Petition for certiorari denied on March 6, 2017
Issue: (1) Whether the hybrid nature of forfeiture proceedings supports the adoption of a clear and convincing standard of proof; (2) whether the Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont's rejection of the petitioner's Eighth Amendment assertion violates due process; (3) whether the adjudicating and prosecuting tribunals' direct pecuniary interests in the outcome of forfeiture proceedings infringe on the neutrality requirement of due process and create a culture of inherent conflict of interest; and (4) whether the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Title 1, Chapter 59, as applied to this line of cases, is impermissibly vague in enumerating innocent-owner expectations.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Todays order list includes a summary opinion, several statements regarding cert denials and a CVSG (Amy Howe, March 6, 2017)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
02/25/2016 | Application (15A901) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 10, 2016 to May 9, 2016, submitted to Justice Thomas. |
03/03/2016 | Application (15A901) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until May 9, 2016. |
05/09/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2016) |
09/07/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016. |
09/22/2016 | Response Requested . (Due October 24, 2016) |
10/25/2016 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 28, 2016. |
12/01/2016 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including December 27, 2016. |
12/27/2016 | Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed. |
01/11/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2017. |
02/15/2017 | Rescheduled. |
02/21/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 24, 2017. |
02/24/2017 | Reply of petitioner Lisa Olivia Leonard filed. (Distributed) |
02/27/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 3, 2017. |
03/06/2017 | Petition DENIED Statement of Justice Thomas respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion) |