Ledezma-Cosino v. Sessions

Petition for certiorari denied on January 8, 2018

Docket No.	Op. Below	Argument	Opinion	Vote	Author	Term
17-313	9th Cir.	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	OT 2017

Issue: Whether, when assessing a statute under rational basis review, a court must consider both the ultimate effect of the statute and the statutory means by which it achieves that effect, or whether a court must look only at the ultimate effect of the statute; and (2) whether the habitual drunkard provision of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f) is unconstitutionally vague.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, September 27, 2017)

Date	Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
08/25/2017	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2017)
09/26/2017	Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 30, 2017.
10/24/2017	Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including November 29, 2017.
11/13/2017	Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court’s Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system.
11/29/2017	Brief of respondent Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General in opposition filed.
12/12/2017	Reply of petitioner Salomon Ledezma-Cosino filed. (Distributed)
12/13/2017	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018.
01/08/2018	Petition DENIED.