Skip to content

Kansas v. Glover

Docket No. Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-556 Nov 4, 2019 Apr 6, 2020 8-1 Thomas OT 2019

Holding: When a police officer lacks information negating an inference that a person driving is the vehicle"s owner, an investigative traffic stop made after running the vehicle"s license plate and learning that the registered owner"s driver"s license has been revoked is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on April 6, 2020. Justice Kagan filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
10/25/2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 28, 2018)
11/26/2018Waiver of right of respondent Charles Glover to respond filed.
11/28/2018Brief amici curiae of States of Oklahoma, et al. filed.
12/12/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.
12/19/2018Response Requested. (Due January 18, 2019)
01/07/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 18, 2019 to February 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
01/09/2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 19, 2019.
02/19/2019Brief of respondent Charles Glover in opposition filed.
03/05/2019Reply of petitioner Kansas filed. (Distributed)
03/06/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
03/25/2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
04/01/2019Petition GRANTED.
04/04/2019Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
04/09/2019Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Kansas.
04/15/2019Joint motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits is granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 17, 2019. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 16, 2019.
04/16/2019Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Kansas
05/28/2019Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.
06/17/2019Brief of petitioner Kansas filed.
06/21/2019Brief amicus curiae of National District Attorneys Association filed.
06/24/2019Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
06/24/2019Brief amici curiae of States of Oklahoma, et al. filed.
06/24/2019Brief amicus curiae of National Fraternal Order of Police filed.
06/24/2019Affidavit of Service filed with respect to brief of amicus curiae of The National Fraternal Order of Police.
06/24/2019Certificate of Compliance filed with respect to brief of amicus curiae of The National Fraternal Order of Police.
07/08/2019SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 4, 2019.
07/12/2019Motion for an extension of time filed.
07/12/2019Motion for a further extension of time to file respondent's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including August 30, 2019.
07/19/2019Motion of United States for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
08/30/2019Brief of respondent Charles Glover filed.
09/03/2019CIRCULATED
09/06/2019Brief amicus curiae of The Rutherford Institute filed. (Distributed)
09/06/2019Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. (Distributed)
09/06/2019Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)
09/06/2019Brief amicus curiae of Professor Andrew Manuel Crespo filed. (Distributed)
09/06/2019Brief amici curiae of Fines and Fees Justice Center, et al. filed. (Distributed)
09/16/2019Record requested from the Supreme Court of Kansas.
09/27/2019Record received from the Appellate Courts of Kansas. (1 Envelope).
09/30/2019Reply of petitioner Kansas filed. (Distributed)
10/07/2019Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
11/04/2019Argued. For petitioner: Toby Crouse, Solicitor General, Topeka, Kan.; and Michael R. Huston, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Sarah E. Harrington, Bethesda, Md.
04/06/2020Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Kagan, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Ginsburg J., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
05/08/2020MANDATE ISSUED.
05/08/2020JUDGMENT ISSUED.