Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC
Docket No. | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
22-148 | Mar 22, 2023 | Jun 8, 2023 | 9-0 | Kagan | OT 2022 |
Holding: When a defendant in a trademark suit uses the mark as a designation of source for its own goods or services " i.e., as a trademark " the threshold Rogers test for trademark infringement claims challenging so-called expressive works, see Rogers v. Grimaldi, does not apply, and the Lanham Act"s exclusion from liability for "[a]ny noncommerical use of a mark" does not shield parody, criticism, or commentary from a claim of trademark dilution.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 8, 2023. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Alito joined. Justice Gorsuch filed a concurring opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Barrett joined.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Jack Daniel's wins big in challenge to spoofing Bad Spaniels dog toy (Ronald Mann, June 9, 2023)
- Justices appear sympathetic to Jack Daniels in trademark parody dispute (Ronald Mann, March 23, 2023)
- Dog toy poking fun at Jack Daniels leads to dispute over parody exception to trademark protections (Ronald Mann, March 20, 2023)
- Court schedules final two argument sessions of 2022-23 term (Amy Howe, January 31, 2023)
- Justices fetch new case on trademark law and parody (James Romoser, November 21, 2022)
- Two petitions probe permissible evidence in convictions and sentencing (Kalvis Golde, September 2, 2022)