|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-433||9th Cir.||Oct 8, 2014||Dec 8, 2014||9-0||Thomas||OT 2014|
Holding: The time spent by warehouse workers waiting to undergo and undergoing security screenings is not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on December 8, 2014. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Kagan joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 5 2013||Application (13A165) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 1, 2013 to October 3, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Aug 12 2013||Application (13A165) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until October 3, 2013.|
|Oct 3 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 7, 2013)|
|Oct 15 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel or the petitioners.|
|Nov 4 2013||Waiver of right of respondents Jesse Busk, et al. to respond filed.|
|Nov 7 2013||Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Nov 7 2013||Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center Inc., et al. filed.|
|Nov 12 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 26, 2013.|
|Nov 13 2013||Response Requested . (Due December 13, 2013)|
|Dec 3 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 13, 2014.|
|Jan 13 2014||Brief of respondents Jesse Busk, and Laurie Castro, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jan 28 2014||Reply of petitioner Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 29 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014.|
|Feb 24 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 28, 2014.|
|Feb 25 2014||Letter of February 25, 2014, from counsel for respondents received. (Distributed)|
|Mar 3 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 26 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 28, 2014.|
|Apr 17 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Apr 25 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents|
|May 9 2014||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 4, 2014.|
|May 28 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|May 28 2014||Brief of petitioner Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amici curiae of National League of Cities, et al. filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation filed.|
|Jul 9 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Jul 16 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT Wednesday, October 8, 2014|
|Jul 17 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Jul 17 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. District of Nevada is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Aug 4 2014||Brief of respondents Jesse Busk and Laurie Castro, et al. filed.|
|Aug 7 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 8 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Aug 8 2014||Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 11 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Employment Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 3 2014||Reply of petitioner Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 2 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 8 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Mark R. Thierman, Reno, Nev.|
|Dec 9 2014||Judgment REVERSED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kagan, J., joined.|
|Jan 12 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.