|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-433||9th Cir.||Oct 8, 2014||Dec 8, 2014||9-0||Thomas||OT 2014|
Holding: The time spent by warehouse workers waiting to undergo and undergoing security screenings is not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act.
Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on December 8, 2014. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Kagan joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Aug 5 2013||Application (13A165) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 1, 2013 to October 3, 2013, submitted to Justice Kennedy.|
|Aug 12 2013||Application (13A165) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until October 3, 2013.|
|Oct 3 2013||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 7, 2013)|
|Oct 15 2013||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel or the petitioners.|
|Nov 4 2013||Waiver of right of respondents Jesse Busk, et al. to respond filed.|
|Nov 7 2013||Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed.|
|Nov 7 2013||Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center Inc., et al. filed.|
|Nov 12 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 26, 2013.|
|Nov 13 2013||Response Requested . (Due December 13, 2013)|
|Dec 3 2013||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 13, 2014.|
|Jan 13 2014||Brief of respondents Jesse Busk, and Laurie Castro, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jan 28 2014||Reply of petitioner Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 29 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014.|
|Feb 24 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 28, 2014.|
|Feb 25 2014||Letter of February 25, 2014, from counsel for respondents received. (Distributed)|
|Mar 3 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|Mar 26 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 28, 2014.|
|Apr 17 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Apr 25 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents|
|May 9 2014||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 4, 2014.|
|May 28 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|May 28 2014||Brief of petitioner Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amici curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amici curiae of National League of Cities, et al. filed.|
|Jun 4 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Retail Federation filed.|
|Jul 9 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Jul 16 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT Wednesday, October 8, 2014|
|Jul 17 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Jul 17 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. District of Nevada is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Aug 4 2014||Brief of respondents Jesse Busk and Laurie Castro, et al. filed.|
|Aug 7 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Aug 8 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Aug 8 2014||Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 11 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Employment Lawyers Association filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 3 2014||Reply of petitioner Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 2 2014||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 8 2014||Argued. For petitioner: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C.; and Curtis E. Gannon, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Mark R. Thierman, Reno, Nev.|
|Dec 9 2014||Judgment REVERSED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Kagan, J., joined.|
|Jan 12 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
As a lawyer, Leondra Kruger argued 12 cases at the U.S. Supreme Court. As a California Supreme Court justice, she has a liberal-leaning record but has sometimes voted with more conservative colleagues in divided cases. Here's @AHoweBlogger's profile:
Profile of a potential nominee: Leondra Kruger - SCOTUSblog
During a 2020 Democratic presidential primary debate, then-candidate Joe Biden pledged that, if elected, he would nomi...
Two candidates to replace Breyer stand apart: Leondra Kruger and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Kruger is six years younger. Jackson recently underwent a Senate confirmation. And the role of Ron Klain, Biden's chief of staff, may be pivotal.
How Biden will choose the next Supreme Court nominee - SCOTUSblog
With today’s reporting that Justice Stephen Breyer intends to retire, we now kick off our analysis of potentia...
Stephen Breyer wrote major opinions favoring abortion rights, demarcating the separation of powers, and rejecting a challenge to Obamacare. In his later years, he questioned the constitutionality of the death penalty. Our retrospective, via @AHoweBlogger:
Stephen Breyer, pragmatic liberal, will retire at end of term - SCOTUSblog
Justice Stephen Breyer, a devoted pragmatist and the senior member of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, will r...
BREAKING: Per @PeteWilliamsNBC of @NBCNews, Justice Stephen Breyer is retiring. The 83-year-old Breyer, a pragmatic liberal who has served on the Supreme Court for nearly 28 years, is expected to tell the White House imminently of his intention to step down.
NEWS: Supreme Court Justice Breyer to retire, @PeteWilliamsNBC reporting live on @NBCNews Special Report
A rule that allows SCOTUS to hear cases before appeals courts weigh in used to be very rare. But in the past three years, it's become far more common. And the justices haven't said why.
@steve_vladeck explains the resurgent writ of "cert before judgment."
The rise of certiorari before judgment - SCOTUSblog
For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging...
Sonia Sotomayor appeared this morning on @TODAYshow to promote her new children's book, "Just Help!: How to Build a Better World." She spoke briefly about the public's perception of the court. Here's the interview: https://www.today.com/video/justice-sotomayor-on-new-book-supreme-court-s-credibility-loss-of-her-mother-131639365722