|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issues: (1) Whether a state official’s demand for all significant donors to a nonprofit organization, as a precondition to engaging in constitutionally protected speech, constitutes a First Amendment injury; and (2) whether official demands for membership or donor information outside the electoral context should be reviewed under strict or exacting scrutiny.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 18 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 21, 2020)|
|Jan 14 2020||Waiver of right of respondent Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of California to respond filed.|
|Jan 17 2020||Letter of January 15, 2020 from counsel for petitioner received.|
|Jan 21 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Jan 30 2020||Response Requested. (Due March 2, 2020)|
|Feb 19 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2020 to April 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 25 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2020.|
|Feb 28 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed.|
|Mar 02 2020||Brief amici curiae of Project for Privacy & Surveillance Accountability and Pacific Research Institute filed.|
|Mar 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 1, 2020 to May 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 25 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 1, 2020.|
|May 01 2020||Brief of respondent Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of California in opposition filed.|
|May 15 2020||Reply of petitioner Institute for Free Speech filed. (Distributed)|
|May 19 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|May 29 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Dec 09 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Dec 23 2020||Supplemental brief of petitioner Institute for Free Speech filed. (Distributed)|
NEW: The Supreme Court rules against the FTC in a dispute with a payday loan company over the extent of the FTC's authority to seek monetary restitution from companies engaged in deceptive practices. SCOTUS says 9-0 that FTC doesn't have that authority under the statute at issue.
NEW: The Supreme Court sides against the federal government and in favor of people who brought Social Security claims in a technical ruling about "exhaustion" rules (essentially, when in the bureaucratic process the claimants were required to raise certain legal arguments).
BREAKING: In 6-3 decision, SCOTUS declines to further limit the ability of states to sentence juveniles to life without parole. The court upholds the sentence of a Mississippi man who killed his grandfather when he was 15; says sentencing procedure did not violate 8th Amendment.
Supreme Court opinions in 15 minutes!
We’re LIVE right now discussing which opinions we could see today and answering your questions. Join us!
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, April 22 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, April 22, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases. Th...
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.