Holtz v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Petition for certiorari denied on October 2, 2017
Issue: Whether, and when, a party is properly held to be "alleging" a "misrepresentation or omission of a material fact" within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. § 78bb(f)(1)(A).
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the day (Aurora Barnes, July 31, 2017)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 04/14/2017 | Application (16A979) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 23, 2017 to May 24, 2017, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
| 04/16/2017 | Application (16A979) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 24, 2017. |
| 05/10/2017 | Application (16A979) to further extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 24, 2017 to June 22, 2017, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
| 05/11/2017 | Application (16A979) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 22, 2017. |
| 06/22/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 24, 2017) |
| 07/19/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 23, 2017. |
| 08/23/2017 | Brief of respondents JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 09/05/2017 | Reply of petitioners Patricia Holtz, et al. filed. |
| 09/06/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017. |
| 10/02/2017 | Petition DENIED. |