Skip to content

Hamm v. Smith

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
23-167 11th Cir. Not Argued Nov 4, 2024 7-2 Per Curiam OT 2024

Holding: The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit to clarify the basis for its decision affirming the district court"s judgment that Joseph Clifton Smith is ineligible for the death penalty due to intellectual disability.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded in a per curiam opinion on November 4, 2024. Justices Thomas and Gorsuch would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and set the case for argument.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
08/17/2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2023)
09/20/2023Brief amici curiae of Idaho, et. al. filed.
09/20/2023Brief of respondent Joseph Clifton Smith in opposition filed.
09/20/2023Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Joseph Clifton Smith.
10/04/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
10/04/2023Reply of petitioner Commissioner, Alabama Dept. of Corrections filed. (Distributed)
10/25/2023Rescheduled.
10/30/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
11/01/2023Rescheduled.
11/06/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
11/08/2023Rescheduled.
11/13/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
11/16/2023Rescheduled.
11/27/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
12/01/2023Rescheduled.
12/01/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
12/15/2023Record Requested.
01/02/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
01/02/2024Electronic record received from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.
01/08/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2024.
01/09/2024Record received from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama (2 boxes).
01/16/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2024.
02/09/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
02/20/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
02/26/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
03/11/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
03/18/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
03/25/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
04/08/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
04/15/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
04/22/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
05/06/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
05/13/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
05/20/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
05/28/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
06/03/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
06/10/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
06/17/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
06/28/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
09/23/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
10/07/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
10/15/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
10/28/2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
11/04/2024Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
11/04/2024Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration consistent with the opinion of the Court. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion). Justice Thomas and Justice Gorsuch would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and set the case for argument.
12/06/2024Judgment Issued.
12/20/2024Record returned to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama (2 boxes).