Greebel v. United States
Petition for certiorari denied on May 30, 2023
Issue: Whether lump-sum compensatory payments to an individual, such as those made pursuant to a retirement plan, qualify as "earnings" subject to the Consumer Credit Protection Act"s garnishment limitations.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Virginia resident challenges electricity rates set by Tennessee Valley Authority (Kalvis Golde, January 20, 2023)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
11/07/2022 | Application (22A417) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 22, 2022 to December 22, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. |
11/09/2022 | Application (22A417) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until December 22, 2022. |
12/21/2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2023) |
01/09/2023 | Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed. |
01/11/2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023. |
01/18/2023 | Response Requested. (Due February 17, 2023) |
02/08/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 17, 2023 to March 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk. |
02/09/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 20, 2023. |
03/14/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 20, 2023 to April 19, 2023, submitted to The Clerk. |
03/15/2023 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 19, 2023. |
04/19/2023 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
05/08/2023 | Reply of petitioner Evan Greebel filed. (Distributed) |
05/09/2023 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023. |
05/30/2023 | Petition DENIED. |