|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-1174||2d Cir.||Dec 9, 2014||Jan 21, 2015||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2014|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case
Holding: When a district court dismisses the only claim in a case that has been consolidated with other actions for pretrial proceedings in multidistrict litigation, the district court’s order is a final and appealable order, even if claims remained in other actions included in the MDL.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 21, 2015.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 6 2014||Application (13A913) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 16, 2014 to April 15, 2014, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.|
|Mar 7 2014||Application (13A913) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until April 15, 2014.|
|Mar 26 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 25, 2014)|
|Apr 17 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 27, 2014, for all respondents.|
|Apr 25 2014||Brief amici curiae of Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, et al. filed.|
|May 27 2014||Brief of respondents Bank of America Corporation, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 3 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 19, 2014.|
|Jun 3 2014||Reply of petitioners Ellen Gelboim, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 23 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2014.|
|Jun 24 2014||Letter of June 24, 2014, from counsel for petitioner received. (Distributed)|
|Jun 30 2014||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 8 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Jul 18 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 29, 2014.|
|Jul 18 2014||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 15, 2014.|
|Aug 4 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Aug 29 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Aug 29 2014||Brief of petitioner Ellen Gelboim, et al. filed.|
|Sep 4 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, December 9, 2014.|
|Sep 5 2014||Brief amici curiae of Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, et al. filed.|
|Sep 22 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit.|
|Sep 23 2014||Record received from U.S.D.C. Western District of North Carolina. The record is electronic.|
|Sep 24 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 2nd Circuit is electronic.|
|Oct 15 2014||Brief of respondents Bank of America Corporation, et al. filed.|
|Oct 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of The United States of America filed.|
|Oct 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of Retired United States District Judges filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 27 2014||CIRCULATED.|
|Nov 14 2014||Reply of petitioners Ellen Gelboim, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 9 2014||Argued. For petitioners: Thomas C. Goldstein, Bethesda, Md. For respondents: Seth P. Waxman, Washington, D. C.|
|Jan 21 2015||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Feb 23 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.