|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-827||10th Cir.||Jan 11, 2017||Mar 22, 2017||8-0||Roberts||OT 2016|
Holding: To meet its substantive obligation under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, a school must offer an "individualized education program" reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on March 22, 2017.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 22 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 25, 2016)|
|Jan 25 2016||Brief amici curiae of Autism Speaks and The Public Interest Law Center filed.|
|Feb 10 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 26, 2016.|
|Feb 22 2016||Response Requested.(Due March 23, 2016)|
|Mar 09 2016||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 15, 2016.|
|Apr 15 2016||Brief of respondent Douglas County School District RE-1 in opposition filed.|
|May 02 2016||Reply of petitioner Endrew F., a Minor, By and Through His Parents and Next Friends, Joseph F. and Jennifer F. filed.|
|May 03 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 19, 2016.|
|May 23 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2016.|
|May 31 2016||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Aug 18 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Sep 06 2016||Supplemental brief of respondent Douglas County School District RE-1 filed.|
|Sep 07 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 26, 2016.|
|Sep 29 2016||Petition GRANTED.|
|Nov 08 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.|
|Nov 14 2016||Brief of petitioner Endrew F., a Minor, By and Through His Parents and Next Friends, Joseph F. and Jennifer F. filed.|
|Nov 14 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Nov 14 2016||Supplemental Joint appendix filed.|
|Nov 15 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondent.|
|Nov 17 2016||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of State Directors of Special Education, in support of neither party filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of 118 Members of Congress filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of Advocates for Children of New York, et al. filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of Former Officials of the U.S. Department of Education filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Disability Rights Network, et al. filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of Disability Rights Organizations, et al. filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amicus curiae of National Education Association filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, et al. filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of Coalition of Texans with Disabilities, et al. filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of Delaware, et al. filed.|
|Nov 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools, et al. filed.|
|Dec 05 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, January 11, 2017.|
|Dec 07 2016||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.|
|Dec 07 2016||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Dec 09 2016||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit. The record is located on PACER, with the exception of the pleadings enclosed in one box.|
|Dec 12 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 14 2016||Brief of respondent Douglas County School District RE-1 filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 21 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Council of the Great City Schools filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of AASA, The School Superintendents Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of Colorado State Board of Education and Colorado Department of Education filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 21 2016||Brief amici curiae of National School Boards Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 28 2016||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Dec 30 2016||Reply of petitioner Endrew F., a Minor, By and Through His Parents and Next Friends, Joseph F. and Jennifer F. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 11 2017||Argued. For petitioners Jeffrey L. Fisher, Stanford, Cal.; and Irv Gornstein, Counselor to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C.|
|Mar 22 2017||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Apr 24 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.