Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. v. Anderson
Petition for certiorari denied on January 18, 2022
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in conflict with other
U.S. Courts of Appeals, erred in concluding that Chadbourne & Parke v. Troice narrowed Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
v. Dabit’s interpretation of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act’s “in
connection with” prong to require that the alleged
deception induce a specific transaction in a particular
covered security.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders (key to color coding) |
|---|
| Oct 12 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 15, 2021) |
| Oct 28 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 15, 2021 to December 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
| Oct 29 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 15, 2021. |
| Nov 15 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al., filed. |
| Dec 15 2021 | Brief of respondents Edward Anderson, et al. in opposition filed. |
| Dec 29 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022. |
| Dec 29 2021 | Reply of petitioners Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| Jan 18 2022 | Petition DENIED. |
