|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issues: (1) Whether the free exercise clause of the First Amendment bars a state-law claim that seeks to compel a religiously affiliated hospital to allow medical procedures that violate its longstanding, deeply held religious beliefs; and (2) whether the First Amendment’s free expression and free association guarantees bar a state-law claim that seeks to compel a religiously affiliated hospital to allow — and thereby endorse and be associated with — medical procedures that violate its longstanding, deeply held religious beliefs.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 13 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 16, 2020)|
|Mar 23 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 16, 2020 to July 15, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 24 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 15, 2020.|
|Apr 13 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty filed.|
|Apr 16 2020||Brief amici curiae of Catholic Medical Association and National Catholic Bioethics Center filed.|
|Apr 16 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Providence St. Joseph Health filed.|
|Apr 16 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence filed.|
|Apr 16 2020||Brief amici curiae of Catholic Health Association of the United States, Alliance for Catholic Health Care filed.|
|Jul 15 2020||Brief of respondent Evan Minton in opposition filed.|
|Jul 28 2020||Reply of petitioner Dignity Health d/b/a Mercy San Juan Medical Center filed. (Distributed)|
|Jul 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Jun 21 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.|
|Jun 21 2021||Supplemental brief of petitioner Dignity Health d/b/a Mercy San Juan Medical Center filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 22 2021||Supplemental brief of respondent Evan Minton filed.|
|Jul 01 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2021.|
|Jul 02 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Sep 08 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.|
|Oct 04 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.|
|Oct 12 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.|
|Oct 25 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.|
|Nov 01 2021||Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, and Justice Gorsuch would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.|
As a lawyer, Leondra Kruger argued 12 cases at the U.S. Supreme Court. As a California Supreme Court justice, she has a liberal-leaning record but has sometimes voted with more conservative colleagues in divided cases. Here's @AHoweBlogger's profile:
Profile of a potential nominee: Leondra Kruger - SCOTUSblog
During a 2020 Democratic presidential primary debate, then-candidate Joe Biden pledged that, if elected, he would nomi...
Two candidates to replace Breyer stand apart: Leondra Kruger and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Kruger is six years younger. Jackson recently underwent a Senate confirmation. And the role of Ron Klain, Biden's chief of staff, may be pivotal.
How Biden will choose the next Supreme Court nominee - SCOTUSblog
With today’s reporting that Justice Stephen Breyer intends to retire, we now kick off our analysis of potentia...
Stephen Breyer wrote major opinions favoring abortion rights, demarcating the separation of powers, and rejecting a challenge to Obamacare. In his later years, he questioned the constitutionality of the death penalty. Our retrospective, via @AHoweBlogger:
Stephen Breyer, pragmatic liberal, will retire at end of term - SCOTUSblog
Justice Stephen Breyer, a devoted pragmatist and the senior member of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing, will r...
BREAKING: Per @PeteWilliamsNBC of @NBCNews, Justice Stephen Breyer is retiring. The 83-year-old Breyer, a pragmatic liberal who has served on the Supreme Court for nearly 28 years, is expected to tell the White House imminently of his intention to step down.
NEWS: Supreme Court Justice Breyer to retire, @PeteWilliamsNBC reporting live on @NBCNews Special Report
A rule that allows SCOTUS to hear cases before appeals courts weigh in used to be very rare. But in the past three years, it's become far more common. And the justices haven't said why.
@steve_vladeck explains the resurgent writ of "cert before judgment."
The rise of certiorari before judgment - SCOTUSblog
For obvious reasons, the Supreme Court’s decision on Monday to grant certiorari in a pair of cases challenging...
Sonia Sotomayor appeared this morning on @TODAYshow to promote her new children's book, "Just Help!: How to Build a Better World." She spoke briefly about the public's perception of the court. Here's the interview: https://www.today.com/video/justice-sotomayor-on-new-book-supreme-court-s-credibility-loss-of-her-mother-131639365722