Skip to content

Dickenson v. Johnson

Petition for certiorari denied on April 17, 2023

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
22-517 11th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2022

Issue: (1) Whether district courts may be required to use the inherently subjective and effectively unreviewable factors to determine common-fund fee awards set out in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. despite the court"s rejection of the that approach in Perdue v. Kenny; (2) whether district courts may be required to calculate common-fund attorney"s fees only as a percentage of the fund, or may instead award fees based on the attorney"s lodestar; and (3) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit may mandate that district courts adopt a 25% "benchmark" for percent-of-fund attorney"s fee awards.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
10/21/2022Application (22A343) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 22, 2022 to December 21, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
10/26/2022Application (22A343) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 1, 2022.
12/01/2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 4, 2023)
12/09/2022Waiver of right of respondent Charles Johnson to respond filed.
01/11/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
01/18/2023Response Requested. (Due February 17, 2023)
02/13/2023Brief of respondent Charles Johnson in opposition filed.
03/01/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
03/03/2023Reply of petitioner Jenna Dickenson filed. (Distributed)
03/13/2023Rescheduled.
03/29/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
04/03/2023Supplemental brief of petitioner Jenna Dickenson filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
04/17/2023Petition DENIED.