|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-761||9th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether prison inmates have a First Amendment right to include threatening, abusive and irrelevant language in grievances.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 12 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2019)|
|Jan 03 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 14, 2019 to February 28, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 08 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 28, 2019.|
|Jan 14 2019||Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed.|
|Feb 28 2019||Brief of respondent Thomas Richey W.S. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 18 2019||Reply of petitioner D. Dahne filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Apr 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.|
|Apr 22 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.|
|May 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 13 2019||Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas and Justice Kavanaugh join, dissenting from denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.