Connecticut v. Baccala
Petition for certiorari denied on December 4, 2017
Issue: Whether a defendant's conviction must be set aside under the fighting words doctrine of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, where the Connecticut Supreme Court recognized a "store manager" exception to the doctrine, thereby paving the way for the removal of verbal epithets from the doctrine's scope and deepening the conflict among the lower and state courts over the existence of the "police" exception and other similar exceptions.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, October 26, 2017)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
09/26/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 30, 2017) |
10/23/2017 | Brief of respondent Nina Baccala in opposition filed. |
10/23/2017 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Nina Baccala. |
11/03/2017 | Reply of petitioner Connecticut filed. |
11/08/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2017. |
12/04/2017 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
12/04/2017 | Petition DENIED. |