Skip to content

Cohen v. Apple, Inc.

Petition for certiorari denied on May 22, 2023

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
22-698 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2022

Issue: Whether state health and safety laws are impliedly preempted, under a purposes-and-objectives theory, by the Federal Communications Commission"s procedural guidelines for reporting how much radiation a cellphone emits.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/10/2022Application (22A427) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 24, 2022 to January 23, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
11/15/2022Application (22A427) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until January 23, 2023.
01/23/2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 27, 2023)
01/26/2023Waiver of right of respondent Apple, Inc. to respond filed.
02/01/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
02/13/2023Response Requested. (Due March 15, 2023)
03/01/2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 15, 2023 to April 14, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
03/02/2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 14, 2023.
03/15/2023Amicus brief of Children’s Health Defense not accepted for filing. (April 12, 2023)
03/15/2023Amicus brief of City of Berkeley not accepted for filing. (April 18, 2023)
03/15/2023Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by City of Berkeley. (April/18/2023)
03/15/2023Brief amicus curiae of Children’s Health Defense (April 14, 2023) filed.
04/14/2023Brief of respondent Apple, Inc. in opposition filed.
05/01/2023Reply of petitioners Andrew Cohen, et al. filed. (Distributed)
05/02/2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
05/22/2023Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by City of Berkeley DENIED.
05/22/2023Petition DENIED.