Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17-515 | 6th Cir. | Not Argued | Feb 20, 2018 | n/a | Per Curiam | OT 2017 |
Holding: The Supreme Court has long held that collective-bargaining agreements must be interpreted “according to ordinary principles of contract law,” as stated in M&G Polymers USA v. Tackett. A contract is not ambiguous unless it is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation, and the inferences made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit under its own precedent, International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Yard-Man Inc., cannot generate a reasonable interpretation because they are not “ordinary principles of contract law.” The only reasonable interpretation of the 1998 agreement between retirees and their former employer is that the health care benefits expired when the collective-bargaining agreement expired in May 2004.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded in a per curiam opinion on February 20, 2018.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Oct 03 2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 6, 2017) |
Oct 23 2017 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, CNH Industrial N.V., et al. |
Oct 23 2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 20, 2017. |
Nov 06 2017 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Whirlpool Corporation. |
Nov 06 2017 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. |
Nov 06 2017 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Erisa Industry Committee. |
Nov 20 2017 | Brief of respondents Jack Reese, et al. in opposition filed. |
Dec 01 2017 | Reply of petitioners CNH Industrial N.V., et al. filed. |
Dec 06 2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018. |
Jan 04 2018 | Rescheduled. |
Jan 08 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2018. |
Jan 16 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2018. |
Feb 05 2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2018. |
Feb 20 2018 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Erisa Industry Committee GRANTED. |
Feb 20 2018 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Whirlpool Corporation GRANTED. |
Feb 20 2018 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. GRANTED. |
Feb 20 2018 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion) |
Mar 26 2018 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
The Supreme Court rules 6-3 against two men on Arizona's death row who say they received ineffective assistance of counsel in state court. SCOTUS says that federal courts reviewing their cases can't hold evidentiary hearings to fully assess their ineffective-counsel claims.
In a dispute over arbitration rights, the Supreme Court unanimously sides with a Taco Bell worker who sued the franchise owner for wage violations. The dispute involved whether the company waited too long to try to move the lawsuit out of court and into arbitration.
The Supreme Court adds no new cases to its docket in this morning's order list. Stephen Breyer writes a brief statement regarding the court's denial of review in a capital case; he reiterates his doubts about the constitutionality of the death penalty. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/052322zor_p86a.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT, followed by opinions starting at 10. You know the drill: We'll be firing up our live blog and breaking it all down. See you there.
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 23 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 23, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 19 conference and opinio...
www.scotusblog.com
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.