|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-515||6th Cir.||Not Argued||Feb 20, 2018||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2017|
Holding: The Supreme Court has long held that collective-bargaining agreements must be interpreted “according to ordinary principles of contract law,” as stated in M&G Polymers USA v. Tackett. A contract is not ambiguous unless it is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation, and the inferences made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit under its own precedent, International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Yard-Man Inc., cannot generate a reasonable interpretation because they are not “ordinary principles of contract law.” The only reasonable interpretation of the 1998 agreement between retirees and their former employer is that the health care benefits expired when the collective-bargaining agreement expired in May 2004.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded in a per curiam opinion on February 20, 2018.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 03 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 6, 2017)|
|Oct 23 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, CNH Industrial N.V., et al.|
|Oct 23 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 20, 2017.|
|Nov 06 2017||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Whirlpool Corporation.|
|Nov 06 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al.|
|Nov 06 2017||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Erisa Industry Committee.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief of respondents Jack Reese, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 01 2017||Reply of petitioners CNH Industrial N.V., et al. filed.|
|Dec 06 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018.|
|Jan 04 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 08 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2018.|
|Jan 16 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2018.|
|Feb 05 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2018.|
|Feb 20 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Erisa Industry Committee GRANTED.|
|Feb 20 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Whirlpool Corporation GRANTED.|
|Feb 20 2018||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. GRANTED.|
|Feb 20 2018||Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)|
|Mar 26 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at SCOTUS: Two oral arguments starting at 10 a.m. EST. One is on federal anti-discrimination laws. The other is on Medicare payments for drugs dispensed by hospitals -- with big questions about the doctrine of Chevron deference lurking in the background.
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...
Two days from now, SCOTUS will hear the biggest abortion case in a generation. In a battle over a Mississippi law, abortion opponents are asking the court to end the constitutional right to abortion. Here's our preview of the case, via @AHoweBlogger.
Roe v. Wade hangs in balance as reshaped court prepares to hear biggest abortion case in decades - SCOTUSblog
When he ran for president in 2016, then-candidate Donald Trump promised to nominate Supreme Court justices who would...