|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-515||6th Cir.||Not Argued||Feb 20, 2018||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2017|
Holding: The Supreme Court has long held that collective-bargaining agreements must be interpreted “according to ordinary principles of contract law,” as stated in M&G Polymers USA v. Tackett. A contract is not ambiguous unless it is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation, and the inferences made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit under its own precedent, International Union, United Auto, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Yard-Man Inc., cannot generate a reasonable interpretation because they are not “ordinary principles of contract law.” The only reasonable interpretation of the 1998 agreement between retirees and their former employer is that the health care benefits expired when the collective-bargaining agreement expired in May 2004.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded in a per curiam opinion on February 20, 2018.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 03 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 6, 2017)|
|Oct 23 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, CNH Industrial N.V., et al.|
|Oct 23 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 20, 2017.|
|Nov 06 2017||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Whirlpool Corporation.|
|Nov 06 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al.|
|Nov 06 2017||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Erisa Industry Committee.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief of respondents Jack Reese, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 01 2017||Reply of petitioners CNH Industrial N.V., et al. filed.|
|Dec 06 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2018.|
|Jan 04 2018||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 08 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2018.|
|Jan 16 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2018.|
|Feb 05 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2018.|
|Feb 20 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Erisa Industry Committee GRANTED.|
|Feb 20 2018||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Whirlpool Corporation GRANTED.|
|Feb 20 2018||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. GRANTED.|
|Feb 20 2018||Petition GRANTED. Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)|
|Mar 26 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...