|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-1495||10th Cir.||Feb 20, 2018||May 29, 2018||n/a||Per Curiam||OT 2017|
Issue: Whether the Fifth Amendment is violated when statements are used at a probable cause hearing but not at a criminal trial.
Judgment: The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted in a per curiam opinion on May 29, 2018. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 10 2017||Application (16A996) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 30, 2017 to June 29, 2017, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Apr 21 2017||Application (16A996) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 29, 2017.|
|Jun 13 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 17, 2017)|
|Jun 29 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 16, 2017.|
|Aug 16 2017||Brief of respondent Matthew Jack D. Vogt in opposition filed.|
|Aug 23 2017||Reply of petitioner City of Hays, Kansas filed.|
|Aug 30 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.|
|Sep 28 2017||Petition GRANTED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
|Oct 02 2017||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner.|
|Oct 31 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, City of Hays, Kansas|
|Nov 02 2017||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Matthew Jack D. Vogt.|
|Nov 06 2017||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Nov 13 2017||Brief of petitioner City of Hays, Kansas filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of The State of Kansas and 12 Other States filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of State and Local Government Employers filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Dec 11 2017||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Dec 13 2017||Brief of respondent Matthew Jack D. Vogt filed.|
|Dec 20 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, February 20, 2018|
|Dec 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of American Federation of Government Employees and American Federation of Teachers filed.|
|Dec 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Criminal Procedure Scholars filed.|
|Dec 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Fraternal Order of Police filed.|
|Dec 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and American Civil Liberties Union filed.|
|Jan 05 2018||CIRCULATED|
|Jan 08 2018||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.|
|Jan 08 2018||Reply of petitioner City of Hays, Kansas filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 10 2018||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit.|
|Jan 12 2018||The entire record from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Feb 01 2018||The record received from the U.S.D.C. District of Kansas is electronic.|
|Feb 20 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Toby J. Heytens, Charlottesville, Va.; and Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Kelsi B. Corkran, Washington, D. C.|
|May 29 2018||Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Opinion per curiam.|
|Jul 02 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.
Cecilia (Cissy) Suyat Marshall, the widow of Thurgood Marshall, died this morning at 94. Here is the court's announcement.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court REJECTS Trump's bid to prevent the House Ways & Means Committee from obtaining his tax returns. No noted dissents.
The brief order may end years of litigation over the committee's efforts to review the tax records of Trump and his businesses.
JUST IN: Whisky, dog toys... and trademark law.
SCOTUS has agreed to hear a dispute between Jack Daniel's and a company that makes squeaking "Bad Spaniels" dog toys. The case will have implications for the tension between parody & intellectual property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zr_e1p3.pdf
In a quiet Monday morning order list, SCOTUS adds no new cases to its docket. The court will not hear Brooks v. Abbott, a challenge to an alleged racial gerrymander of a state senate district in Texas. Here's the full order list: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112122zor_7lhn.pdf
JUST IN: The Biden administration, as expected, asks the Supreme Court to revive Biden's student-loan relief plan. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit blocked the government from implementing the plan; Biden wants SCOTUS to lift that ruling. https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/22A444-2.pdf