Enter your email address to subscribe to updates to this case (by doing so, you are accepting the terms in our privacy policy):
          

Carr v. Saul

Consolidated with:

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-1442 10th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD OT 2020

Issue: Whether a claimant seeking disability benefits under the Social Security Act forfeits an appointments-clause challenge to the appointment of an administrative law judge by failing to present that challenge during administrative proceedings.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jun 29 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2020)
Jun 29 2020Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.
Jul 29 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 31, 2020 to August 31, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Jul 30 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 31, 2020.
Aug 24 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 31, 2020 to September 30, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Aug 25 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 30, 2020.
Sep 29 2020Brief of respondent Saul, Andrew M. filed.
Oct 14 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
Oct 14 2020Reply of petitioners Willie Earl Carr, et al. filed.
Nov 02 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
Nov 09 2020Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 20-105 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.
Nov 09 2020Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 19-1442. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 19-1442. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”
Nov 09 2020As Rule 34.6 provides, “If the Court schedules briefing and oral argument in a case that was governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c) or Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1(c), the parties shall submit electronic versions of all prior and subsequent filings with this Court in the case, subject to [applicable] redaction rules.” Subsequent party and amicus filings in the case should now be submitted through the Court’s electronic filing system, with any necessary redactions.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards