|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-577||6th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2014|
Issue: (1) Whether the standing requirements of Article III apply to all members of a class certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23; and (2) whether certifying a class under Rule 23(b)(3) is improper where individualized damages issues predominate, and where plaintiffs rely exclusively on aggregate damages models that calculate damages purportedly incurred by the class as a whole, rather than by individual class members.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 18 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 19, 2014)|
|Dec 5 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Dec 10 2014||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including January 20, 2015.|
|Dec 19 2014||Brief amicus curiae of DRI-The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Dec 19 2014||Brief amici curiae of Atlantic Legal Foundation, et al. filed.|
|Dec 19 2014||Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Dec 19 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Dow Chemical Company filed.|
|Dec 23 2014||Brief of respondent Direct Purchaser Class in opposition filed.|
|Dec 23 2014||Brief of respondent Indirect Purchaser Class in opposition filed.|
|Jan 6 2015||Reply of petitioners Carpenter Co., et al. filed.|
|Jan 14 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 20, 2015.|
|Jan 29 2015||Supplemental brief of petitioners Carpenter Co., et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 3 2015||Supplemental brief of respondent Direct Purchaser Class filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 18 2015||Rescheduled.|
|Feb 23 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 27, 2015.|
|Mar 2 2015||Petition DENIED.|
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.