|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|16-1371||3d Cir.||Jan 9, 2018||May 14, 2018||9-0||Kennedy||OT 2017|
Holding: The mere fact that a driver in lawful possession or control of a rental car is not listed on the rental agreement will not defeat his or her otherwise reasonable expectation of privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on May 14, 2018. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Gorsuch joined. Justice Alito filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 11 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 15, 2017)|
|Jun 08 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 17, 2017.|
|Jun 12 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Association for Public Defense filed.|
|Jul 17 2017||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Aug 01 2017||Reply of petitioner Terrence Byrd filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 02 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017.|
|Sep 28 2017||Petition GRANTED.|
|Nov 13 2017||Brief of petitioner Terrence Byrd filed.|
|Nov 13 2017||Joint appendix filed.|
|Nov 15 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Southwestern Law Student Lindsey N. Ursua, et al. filed.|
|Nov 16 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Restore the Fourth, Inc. filed.|
|Nov 17 2017||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, January 9, 2018|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of The American Civil Liberties Union and The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Motorists Association filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of National Ass'n for Public Defense and the National Ass'n of Federal Defenders filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. filed.|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amicus curiae of Morgan A. Cloud filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of Fourth Amendment Scholars filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 22 2017||CIRCULATED.|
|Dec 13 2017||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 18 2017||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit.|
|Dec 20 2017||Brief amici curiae of Arizona, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 28 2017||Record received from the United States District Court Middle District of Pennsylvania (Harrisburg). The record is electronic.|
|Dec 28 2017||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 3rd Circuit is electronic, and contain some Sealed Documents.|
|Dec 28 2017||Reply of petitioner Terrence Byrd filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 09 2018||Argued. For petitioner: Robert M. Loeb, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Eric J. Feigin, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|May 14 2018||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jun 15 2018||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.