|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1019||7th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether a state, consistent with the 14th Amendment, may require an ultrasound as part of informed consent at least 18 hours before an abortion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 28 2018||Application (18A686) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 3, 2019 to February 4, 2019, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.|
|Jan 03 2019||Application (18A686) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until February 4, 2019.|
|Feb 04 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2019)|
|Feb 06 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2019 to April 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 08 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 5, 2019.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Faith and Family filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amici curiae of American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists et al. filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Focus on the Family filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amici curiae of Operation Outcry, Women Injured by Abortion, The Justice Foundation, Melinda Thybault filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of CatholicVote.org Education Fund filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Pro Life Action League filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Prolife Center at the University of St. Thomas filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amici curiae of Louisiana, et al. filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Trinity Legal Center filed.|
|Apr 05 2019||Brief of respondent Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Apr 22 2019||Reply of petitioners Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. filed.|
|Apr 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.|
|May 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.|
|Sep 11 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Oct 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.|
|Oct 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.|
|Jun 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.|
|Jul 02 2020||Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo, 591 U. S. ___ (2020).|
|Aug 03 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.