|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1019||7th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether a state, consistent with the 14th Amendment, may require an ultrasound as part of informed consent at least 18 hours before an abortion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 28 2018||Application (18A686) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 3, 2019 to February 4, 2019, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.|
|Jan 03 2019||Application (18A686) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until February 4, 2019.|
|Feb 04 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 6, 2019)|
|Feb 06 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2019 to April 5, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 08 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 5, 2019.|
|Feb 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Institute for Faith and Family filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amici curiae of American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists et al. filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Focus on the Family filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amici curiae of Operation Outcry, Women Injured by Abortion, The Justice Foundation, Melinda Thybault filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of CatholicVote.org Education Fund filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Pro Life Action League filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Prolife Center at the University of St. Thomas filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amici curiae of Louisiana, et al. filed.|
|Mar 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Trinity Legal Center filed.|
|Apr 05 2019||Brief of respondent Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|Apr 22 2019||Reply of petitioners Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Department of Health, et al. filed.|
|Apr 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.|
|May 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2019.|
|Sep 11 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Oct 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.|
|Oct 15 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2019.|
|Jun 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2020.|
|Jul 02 2020||Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of June Medical Services L.L.C. v. Russo, 591 U. S. ___ (2020).|
|Aug 03 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.