|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-1468||N.D.||Apr 20, 2016||Jun 23, 2016||7-1||Alito||OT 2015|
Holding: The Fourth Amendment permits warrantless breath tests incident to arrests for drunk driving but not warrantless blood tests.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 7-1, in an opinion by Justice Alito on June 23, 2016. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 1 2015||Application (14A1122) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 13, 2015 to July 10, 2015, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|May 5 2015||Application (14A1122) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until June 12, 2015.|
|Jun 12 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 16, 2015)|
|Jul 15 2015||Waiver of right of respondent North Dakota to respond filed.|
|Jul 29 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Aug 10 2015||Response Requested . (Due September 9, 2015)|
|Sep 16 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including September 24, 2015.|
|Sep 24 2015||Brief of respondent North Dakota in opposition filed.|
|Oct 14 2015||Reply of petitioner Danny Birchfield filed.|
|Nov 17 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 4, 2015.|
|Dec 7 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 11, 2015.|
|Dec 11 2015||Petition GRANTED The petitions for writs of certiorari in No. 14-1470 and No. 14-1507 are granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.|
|Jan 26 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' briefs on the merits is extended to and including February 4, 2016. VIDED|
|Jan 26 2016||The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including March 15, 2016. VIDED|
|Feb 4 2016||Brief of petitioner Danny Birchfield filed.|
|Feb 4 2016||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner Danny Birchfield. VIDED.|
|Feb 8 2016||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Indiana Tech Law School Amicus Project in support of neither party. VIDED.|
|Feb 9 2016||Brief amicus curiae of DUI Defense Lawyers Association filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 11 2016||Brief amici curiae of Downsize DC Foundation, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 11 2016||Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Liberties Union filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 11 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National College for DUI Defense, and The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed. VIDED.|
|Feb 29 2016||Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED. VIDED|
|Feb 29 2016||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Indiana Tech Law School Amicus Project in support of neither party GRANTED. VIDED|
|Mar 4 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Wednesday, April 20, 2016. VIDED|
|Mar 14 2016||Record requested from the Supreme Court of North Dakota.|
|Mar 15 2016||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 15 2016||Brief of respondent North Dakota filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 16 2016||Brief amicus curiae of The California District Attorneys Association filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amici curiae of New Jersey and Seventeen Other States filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amici curiae of The Council of State Governments, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Motion of the Solicitor General for enlargement of time for oral argument, for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. VIDED.|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amicus curiae of Mothers Against Drunk Driving filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Mar 22 2016||Brief amici curiae of The National District Attorneys Association, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Apr 4 2016||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for enlargement of time for oral argument, and for divided argument GRANTED. and the time is divided as follows: 35 minutes for petitioners, 15 minutes for respondent North Dakota, 10 minutes for respondent Minnesota, and 10 minutes for the Solicitor General. VIDED|
|Apr 13 2016||Reply of petitioner Danny Birchfield filed. (Distributed.)|
|Apr 20 2016||Argued. For petitioners: Charles A. Rothfeld, Washington, D. C. For respondents in Nos. 14-1468 & 14-1507: Thomas R. McCarthy, Arlington, Va. For respondent in 14-1470: Kathryn Keena, Assistant Dakota County Attorney, Hastings, Minn. For United States as amicus curiae in support of respondents: Ian H. Gershengorn, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. VIDED.|
|Jun 23 2016||Judgment in No. 14-1468 REVERSED and case REMANDED. Judgment in No. 14-1470 AFFIRMED. Judgment in No. 14-1507 VACATED AND REMANDED. Alito, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Breyer, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Ginsburg, J., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.|
|Jul 25 2016||JUDGMENT ISSUED|
|Jul 25 2016||MANDATE ISSUED|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.