Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11-1085 | 9th Cir. | Nov 5, 2012 | Feb 27, 2013 | 6-3 | Ginsburg | OT 2012 |
Holding: Proof of materiality is not a prerequisite to certification of a securities-fraud class action seeking money damages for alleged violations of Securities and Exchange Commission Rule #10(b) and Rule 1.
Judgment: Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on February 27, 2013. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Kennedy joined and which Justice Scalia joined except for part I-B.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Mar 1 2012 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 4, 2012) |
Mar 26 2012 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 4, 2012. |
Apr 4 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Commissioners, et al. filed. |
Apr 4 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. filed. |
Apr 4 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. |
May 2 2012 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including May 11, 2012. |
May 11 2012 | Brief of respondent Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds in opposition filed. |
May 21 2012 | Reply of petitioners Amgen Inc., et al. filed. |
May 22 2012 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 7, 2012. |
May 31 2012 | Letter and attachment of respondent Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds filed. (Distributed) |
Jun 4 2012 | Letter of petitioner Amgen Inc., et al. in response filed. (Distributed) |
Jun 11 2012 | Petition GRANTED. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |
Jun 21 2012 | The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 8, 2012. |
Jun 21 2012 | The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 20, 2012. |
Jul 16 2012 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners Amgen Inc., et al. |
Jul 23 2012 | SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday, November 5, 2012 |
Jul 25 2012 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners. |
Aug 2 2012 | Record recieved from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit. (1 box) |
Aug 3 2012 | Record recieved from U.S.D.C. for Central District of California. (2 boxes) |
Aug 8 2012 | Brief of petitioners Amgen Inc., et al. filed. |
Aug 13 2012 | Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioners GRANTED. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. |
Aug 13 2012 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party or neither party received from counsel for the respondent. |
Aug 14 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed. |
Aug 15 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation, et al. filed. |
Aug 15 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. |
Aug 15 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Former SEC Commissioners, et al. filed. |
Aug 15 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association filed. |
Aug 24 2012 | CIRCULATED. |
Sep 20 2012 | Brief of respondent Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 27 2012 | Justice Breyer is no longer recused in this case. |
Sep 27 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of the United States filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 27 2012 | Brief of National Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 27 2012 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. |
Sep 27 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Public Justice, P.C. filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 27 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Civil Procedure and Securities Law Professors filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 27 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of AARP filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 27 2012 | Brief amici curiae of New York City Pension Funds, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 27 2012 | Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 27 2012 | Brief amici curiae of Financial Economists filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 27 2012 | Brief amici curiae of California Public Employees' Retirement System, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Oct 15 2012 | Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. |
Oct 22 2012 | Reply of petitioners Amgen Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Nov 5 2012 | Argued. For petitioners: Seth P. Waxman, Washington, D. C. For respondent: David C. Frederick, Washington, D. C.; and Melissa Arbus Sherry, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) |
Feb 27 2013 | Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a concurring opinion. Scalia, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Thomas, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kennedy, J., joined, and in which Scalia, J., joined except for Part I-B. |
Apr 1 2013 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
Jul 5 2013 | Record returned to U.S. D.C. for Central District of California. |
In yet another Friday night shadow docket order, a divided Supreme Court sides with challengers to California’s COVID-related restrictions. Brief per curiam opinion and dissent from Justice Kagan: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
By vote of 5-4, #SCOTUS blocks California's COVID-related restrictions on in-home prayer meetings and worship. Opinion & Kagan's dissent are here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
President Biden will sign an executive order authorizing a commission to study Supreme Court reform. The commission will review “the length of service and turnover of justices on the court; the membership and size of the court” among other topics.
President Biden to Sign Executive Order Creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States | The White House
President Biden will today issue an executive order forming the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, comprised of a
www.whitehouse.gov
The Supreme Court will hear April and May oral arguments remotely but with a live audio feed.
#SCOTUS confirms that "[i]n keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19," it will hear oral arguments in April and on May 4 remotely, as it has for the other argument sessions this term. Press release here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Media-Advisory-Teleconference-Arguments.pdf
In a Monday evening shadow-docket filing, Tennessee asks the Supreme Court to reinstate a state law that imposes a 48-hour waiting period for patients to abortions. A federal judge struck down the waiting period as unconstitutional. @AHoweBlogger explains:
Tennessee asks court to restore waiting period for abortions - SCOTUSblog
Tennessee filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices for permission to enforce...
www.scotusblog.com
BREAKING: In major copyright battle between tech giants, SCOTUS sides w/ Google over Oracle, finding that Google didnt commit copyright infringement when it reused lines of code in its Android operating system. The code came from Oracle's JAVA SE platform. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf
NEW: The Supreme Court agrees to take up one new case, Brown v. Davenport. It's a technical but important question about the standard for federal courts reviewing habeas claims to assess whether constitutional violations were "harmless error." https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040521zor_3204.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.