|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-798||9th Cir.||Apr 16, 2013||Jun 13, 2013||9-0||Kagan||OT 2012|
Holding: The Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA) expressly preempts provisions in concession agreements between the port and short-haul trucking companies that require trucks moving cargo in and out of the port to affix placards bearing a phone number to receive complaints to each truck and to submit a plan for off-street parking for the trucks.
Judgment: Reversed in part and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 13, 2013. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 22 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2012)|
|Jan 4 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 21, 2012, for all respondents.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amici curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, et al. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.|
|Feb 21 2012||Brief of respondents National Resources Defense Council, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 21 2012||Brief of respondents City of Los Angeles, California, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 2 2012||Reply of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Mar 7 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 23, 2012.|
|Mar 26 2012||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Nov 30 2012||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Dec 10 2012||Supplemental brief of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Dec 12 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013.|
|Jan 7 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 11, 2013.|
|Jan 11 2013||Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition.|
|Feb 11 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 16, 2013|
|Feb 15 2013||Brief of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 15 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States supporting reversal filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of California Construction Trucking Association filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence and Harbor Trucking Association filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. filed.|
|Feb 25 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic.|
|Feb 25 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for Central District of California is electronic..|
|Mar 1 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 18 2013||Brief of respondents City of Los Angeles, California, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 18 2013||Brief of respondents National Resources Defense Council, et al. (Distributed) filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Los Angleles Chamber of Commerce filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Counties, et al. filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Airports Council International - North America filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amici curiae of California and Washington filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 1 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Apr 5 2013||Reply of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed. (Distributed).|
|Apr 16 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Daniel N. Lerman, Washington, D. C.; and John F. Bash, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) Steve Rosenthal for the respondents.|
|Jun 13 2013||Adjudged to be REVERSED IN PART and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jul 15 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Our first TikTok of the new term. @katieleebarlow breaks down opening day.
The new bench.
By William Hennessy, longtime court artist and new SCOTUSblog contributor.
The chief justice has a new top aide. From @ellena_erskine:
Roberts appoints federal district judge from Illinois as his new counselor - SCOTUSblog
Chief Justice John Roberts appointed Judge Robert Dow Jr. to take over from his long-time aid, Jeffrey Minear, as ...
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up NINE new cases, including Gonzalez v. Google, involving the scope of tech companies' immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The order list is not yet posted on the court's website, but here is a link: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/100322ZOR.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: It's the opening day of the 2022-23 term. At 9:30 a.m. EDT, the court will issue orders, which may include cert grants from last week's "long conference." Then, at 10, the court will hear two arguments as Ketanji Brown Jackson takes the bench for the first time.
Goodbye SCOTUS, a fond farewell . . .
Goodbye SCOTUS, A Fond Farewell - Art Lien, Courtartist
Tomorrow begins a new term for the Court, and I won’t be there. My first visit to the Supreme Court was ...