|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|11-798||9th Cir.||Apr 16, 2013||Jun 13, 2013||9-0||Kagan||OT 2012|
Holding: The Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA) expressly preempts provisions in concession agreements between the port and short-haul trucking companies that require trucks moving cargo in and out of the port to affix placards bearing a phone number to receive complaints to each truck and to submit a plan for off-street parking for the trucks.
Judgment: Reversed in part and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 13, 2013. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 22 2011||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 23, 2012)|
|Jan 4 2012||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including February 21, 2012, for all respondents.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amici curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, et al. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed.|
|Jan 23 2012||Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.|
|Feb 21 2012||Brief of respondents National Resources Defense Council, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Feb 21 2012||Brief of respondents City of Los Angeles, California, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Mar 2 2012||Reply of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Mar 7 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 23, 2012.|
|Mar 26 2012||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Nov 30 2012||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Dec 10 2012||Supplemental brief of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Dec 12 2012||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 4, 2013.|
|Jan 7 2013||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 11, 2013.|
|Jan 11 2013||Petition GRANTED limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition.|
|Feb 11 2013||SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, April 16, 2013|
|Feb 15 2013||Brief of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 15 2013||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of the United States supporting reversal filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Airlines for America filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of California Construction Trucking Association filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence and Harbor Trucking Association filed.|
|Feb 22 2013||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. filed.|
|Feb 25 2013||Record from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit is electronic.|
|Feb 25 2013||Record from U.S.D.C. for Central District of California is electronic..|
|Mar 1 2013||CIRCULATED.|
|Mar 18 2013||Brief of respondents City of Los Angeles, California, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 18 2013||Brief of respondents National Resources Defense Council, et al. (Distributed) filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Los Angleles Chamber of Commerce filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Counties, et al. filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amicus curiae of Airports Council International - North America filed.|
|Mar 25 2013||Brief amici curiae of California and Washington filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 1 2013||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Apr 5 2013||Reply of petitioner American Trucking Associations, Inc. filed. (Distributed).|
|Apr 16 2013||Argued. For petitioner: Daniel N. Lerman, Washington, D. C.; and John F. Bash, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) Steve Rosenthal for the respondents.|
|Jun 13 2013||Adjudged to be REVERSED IN PART and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jul 15 2013||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
JUST IN: The Supreme Court agrees to take up five new cases, including an appeal from a high school football coach who lost his job after he prayed on the field.
#SCOTUS will have more opinions next Thursday at 10 am.
A workplace vaccine-or-test requirement that would have covered 84 million workers -- blocked. A vaccine mandate for over 10 million health care workers -- allowed to take effect.
Full analysis from @AHoweBlogger on this afternoon's rulings:
Fractured court blocks vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces but green-lights vaccine mandate for health care workers - SCOTUSblog
With COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations reaching a new record high as a result of the Omicron variant, the Suprem...
Here's a two-minute explainer from @katieleebarlow, SCOTUSblog's TikTokker-in-residence, on the pair of vaccine decisions the court just handed down.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court BLOCKS the federal government's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test requirement for large workplaces. The court ALLOWS a vaccine mandate for workers at federally funded health care facilities to take effect nationwide.
SCOTUS releases just one opinion today: an 8-1 decision on an arcane question of pension payments for "dual-status military technicians." The court rules in favor of the government's statutory interpretation and against the technicians. Barrett has the opinion; Gorsuch dissents.