Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Richard M. Re Guest

Richard is an Assistant Professor of Law at UCLA. He blogs at Re’s Judicata (https://richardresjudicata.wordpress.com/).

Date Post Title
Next Page »
05.14.19 Opinion analysis: Hyatt fulfills expectations in a surprising way
01.09.19 Argument analysis: The familiar yet fresh debate in Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt
01.03.19 Argument preview: Immunity, precedent and federalism in Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt
06.29.18 Tribute: Seeing Justice Kennedy think
05.14.18 Opinion analysis: When a statutory exclusionary rule “makes sense”
02.22.18 Argument analysis: What makes wiretap orders “insufficient”?
02.14.18 Argument preview: Should courts read statutory exclusionary rules broadly?
10.18.16 Legal scholarship highlight: When lower courts don’t follow Supreme Court precedent
06.09.16 Opinion analysis: Another step toward constitutionalizing recusal obligations
02.29.16 Argument analysis: Seeking a recusal rule that the Justices can live with
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards