Skip to main content

Kate Howard

40 Articles
Showing 1 - 1240 Results

Petitions to watch | Conference of May 11

In its conference of May 11, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether the Second Amendment entitles ordinary, law-abiding citizens to carry handguns outside the home for self-defense in some manner, including concealed carry when open carry is forbidden by state law;

ByKate Howard/May 10, 2017

Petitions to watch | Conference of April 28

In its conference of April 28, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether a statute which does not amend any generally applicable substantive or procedural laws, but deprives the petitioner of the right to pursue his pending lawsuit, violates the due process clause of

ByKate Howard/Apr 27, 2017

Petitions to watch | Conference of April 21

In its conference of April 21, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether a state law that imposes retroactive tax liability for a period of almost seven years violates the due process clause; whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell phone records

ByKate Howard/Apr 20, 2017

Petitions to watch | Conference of April 13

In its conference of April 13, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free

ByKate Howard/Apr 11, 2017

Petitions to watch | Conference of March 31

In its conference of March 31, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether the Alien Tort Statute categorically forecloses corporate liability; whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his

ByKate Howard/Mar 29, 2017

Petitions to watch | Conference of March 24

In its conference of March 24, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether Item 303 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K creates a duty to disclose that is actionable under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5; whether

ByKate Howard/Mar 23, 2017

Petitions to watch | Conference of March 17

In its conference of March 17, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether the court’s decision in Hall v. Florida must be applied retroactively on collateral review; whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression

ByKate Howard/Mar 13, 2017

Petitions to watch | Conference of March 3

In its conference of March 3, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free

ByKate Howard/Mar 1, 2017

Petitions to watch | Conference of February 24

In its conference of February 24, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(C) can deprive a court of appeals of jurisdiction over an appeal that is statutorily timely, or whether it is instead a nonjurisdictional

ByKate Howard/Feb 23, 2017

Petitions to watch | Conference of February 17

In its conference of February 17, 2017, the court will consider petitions involving issues such as whether a guilty plea inherently waives a defendant’s right to challenge the constitutionality of his statute of conviction; whether it is a violation of the 14th Amendment guarantee of equal

ByKate Howard/Feb 13, 2017

Petitions of the day

The petitions of the day are: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Michigan Department of Treasury 16-699 Issues: (1) Whether the Multistate Tax Compact has the status of a contract that binds its signatory states; and (2) whether a state law that imposes retroactive tax liability for a period of almost

ByKate Howard/Feb 7, 2017

Petition of the day

The petition of the day is: Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur v. Farhang 16-692 Issues: (1) Whether a choice-of-law provision in a foreign state’s contract automatically waives sovereign immunity under 28 U.S.C. § 1605(a)(1), regardless of the contract’s other terms indicating an intent not

ByKate Howard/Jan 20, 2017

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.