The morning read for Friday, March 31
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court.
Every post published in March 2023, most recent first.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court.
The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court.
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here. This week’s update will be brief because of the press of business in my day job.
In Wednesday’s oral argument in Samia v. United States, the justices explored the intricacies of the Sixth Amendment confrontation clause, evidence law, and jury instructions, as they sought to develop a workable rule governing the admission of confessions in trials with multiple defendants.
Over several years, Remo Polselli racked up over $2 million in federal tax liabilities. After he made a partial payment from the account of one of his limited liability companies, the IRS suspected Remo might be hiding his assets by transferring them to other entities or individuals.
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court.
Tuesday’s decision in Wilkins v. United States broke no new ground, as it followed a steady line of cases applying a rule under which time limits in federal statutes do not create jurisdictional bars unless the statute makes that intent clear.
During oral argument in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi on Monday, the justices explored how to write an opinion on patent enablement when the parties agree on almost everything about the legal standard. “Enablement” is the requirement that a patent must enable others to make and use the invention without undue experimentation.
Tuesday’s argument in Lora v. United States suggested that Efrain Lora, a Bronx man convicted of killing a rival drug dealer, is likely to get his re-sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act.