Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

There is a possibility of opinions on Wednesday at 10:00 a.m. We will begin live-blogging at 9:45 a.m. at this link, where readers can also sign up for an email reminder when we start the live blog.
On Wednesday the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC; Ronald Mann has our preview.

Evan Lee Guest

Evan Lee is Professor of Law at UC Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco.

Date Post Title
Next Page »
10.31.18 Argument analysis: Court skeptical that a lawyer may unilaterally countermand client’s instruction to file a criminal appeal
10.23.18 Argument preview: Can a criminal defense lawyer refuse to file an appeal from a guilty plea because of an appeal waiver? (Corrected)
06.19.18 Opinion analysis: Plain Sentencing Guidelines errors “ordinarily” justify relief
02.22.18 Argument analysis: Justices hint at categorical approach to correcting forfeited Sentencing Guidelines errors
02.14.18 Argument preview: Should forfeited Sentencing Guidelines errors normally be corrected?
06.24.16 Opinion analysis: Victory for the “categorical approach” in immigration and federal criminal sentencing – but for how long?
04.27.16 Argument analysis: The Justices continue to struggle with the “modified categorical approach”
04.19.16 Argument preview: Growing pains in the mass incarceration and deportation movements
04.04.16 Opinion analysis: News item – the convicted sex offender wins, unanimously
03.02.16 Argument analysis: Justices skeptical about government’s interpretation of sex-offender-registration law
Term Snapshot
Awards